LESLIE E. KNIGHTEN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the Tax Court is constitutional and that the taxpayer's arguments regarding its jurisdiction were frivolous.
The taxpayer raised a constitutional challenge to the Tax Court's existence and jurisdiction for the first time in his reply brief. The court initiall…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Article I Courts cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
In our earlier opinion in this case, we refused to consider Knighten’s contention that the Tax Court is unconstitutional, because he did not raise the issue until his reply brief. Knighten v. Commissioner, 702 F. 2d 59, 60 n. 1 (5th Cir.1983). On petition for rehearing, Knighten points out that questions of subject-matter jurisdiction may be raised at any time, and an unconstitutional court can have no jurisdiction. We therefore consider the issue.
Knighten presents two contentions: (1) that, as a court created under Article I of the Constitution, the Tax Court could not hear any cases that could be heard by Article III courts; and (2) that, even if the Tax Court is constitutional, Knighten’s case raised issues beyond its statutorily-limited jurisdiction. Both of these contentions are as frivolous as his earlier ones. The argument that the Tax Court violates Article III has been repeatedly rejected. E.g., Melton v. Kurtz, 575 F. 2d 547 (5th Cir.1978); Willis v. Alexander, 575 F. 2d 495 (5th Cir.1978); Nash Miami Motors, Inc. v. Commissioner, 358 F. 2d 636 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 918, 87 S.Ct. 227, 17 L.Ed.2d 142 (1966). The argument that this case raised issues beyond the Tax Court’s statutory jurisdiction is totally conclusory, devoid of any reference to a particular issue. We find no basis in the record for this theory of lack of jurisdiction.
In all other respects, including the award of double costs against Knighten, we adhere to our earlier opinion.
The petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED to the extent set forth above and otherwise DENIED. No Judge in regular active service on this Court having requested that the Court. be polled on rehearing en banc, the suggestion for rehearing en banc is also DENIED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Knighten v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 702 F.2d 59 (5th Cir. 1983)
-
Knoblauch v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 749 F.2d 200 (5th Cir. 1984)
-
Granzow v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 739 F.2d 265 (7th Cir. 1984)
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Knighten v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 702 F.2d 59 (5th Cir. 1983)
- Nash Miami Motors, Inc. v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 358 F.2d 636 (5th Cir. 1966)
- Nash Miami Motors, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 385 U.S. 918 (U.S. 1966)
- Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. United Benefit Life Ins. Co., 385 U.S. 918 (U.S. 1966)
- Rosser B. Melton, Jr. v. Kurtz, 575 F.2d 547 (5th Cir. 1978)
- Howell C. Willis v. Alexander, 575 F.2d 495 (5th Cir. 1978)