DAYS INN OF AMERICA AND SCOTT WETZEL SERVICES, APPELLANTS,
v.
WANDA BLANNER, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Permanent Total Disability Benefits cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This cause is before us on appeal from a workers’ compensation order awarding permanent total disability benefits for as long as claimant remains permanently disabled and awarding attorney fees of $10,500 for services rendered claimant.
The testimony of a medical doctor and claimant provide competent, substantial evidence to support the deputy’s decision. Therefore, the award of permanent total disability is affirmed.
Since the order fails to set forth information by which this court can determine what criteria of Lee Engineering and Construction Company v. Fellows, 209 So. 2d 454 (Fla.1968), were considered by the deputy and how they were applied in determining the award of $10,500 in attorney fees, the order must be remanded in that regard for entry of a proper order. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for entry of an order consistent herewith.
NIMMONS and ZEHMER, JJ., and GUYTE P. McCORD, Jr. (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dilar S. Booker v. State, 482 So. 2d 414 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)…find that the [*419] trial court did not err in departing more than one cell above the guidelines presumptive sentence based on the defendant’s violation of probation. See Riggins v. State, 477 So. 2d 663 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). Cf. Thrasher v. State, 477 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). We recognize the supreme court’s recent disapproval of “double dipping” in guidelines scoring. Hendrix v. State, 475 So. 2d 1218 (Fla.1985). Nevertheless, our view is reinforced by the fact that nowhere on a sentencing guideline…
-
Thompson v. State, 478 So. 2d 462 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)…r which defendant was never convicted. This is violative of rule 3.701(d)(ll), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, which prohibits reasons for deviation that relate to “prior arrests for which convictions have not been obtained.” Thrasher v. State, 477 So. 2d 1083, (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). The court also made two general statements in its reasons for departure that are not explained sufficiently to constitute clear and convincing reasons: (1) The guidelines sentence provides insufficient [*465] time for retribut…
-
Wilkins v. State, 479 So. 2d 297 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…or which the defendant had never been convicted and upon certain allegations made in the presentence investigation which were uncorroborated hearsay. We find merit in both of the defendant’s contentions and, consequently, reverse. Thrasher v. State, 477 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Cannada v. State, 472 So. 2d 1296 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Scott v. State, 469 So. 2d 865 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). The defendant also contends that the trial court erred in ordering an assessment of attorney…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Gray v. Attorney Gen., State of Fla. and/or State Attorney, Cir. Court, Volusia Cnty., Fla., 209 So. 2d 454 (Fla. 1968)