WESLEY WILKINS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Presentence Investigation Report cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Wesley Wilkins seeks review of a five-year prison sentence imposed by the trial court in excess of the guidelines’ recommended sentence. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). The defendant contends that the trial court erred in relying upon prior charges for which the defendant had never been convicted and upon certain allegations made in the presentence investigation which were uncorroborated hearsay. We find merit in both of the defendant’s contentions and, consequently, reverse. Thrasher v. State, 477 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Cannada v. State, 472 So. 2d 1296 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Scott v. State, 469 So. 2d 865 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11).
The defendant also contends that the trial court erred in ordering an assessment of attorney’s fees and costs without giving him proper notice. We agree that the defendant was improperly noticed, see Jenkins v. State, 444 So. 2d 947 (Fla.1984), and, therefore, reverse that order as well. Our reversal is without prejudice to the state to seek imposition of fees and costs upon proper notice. Jenkins, 444 So. 2d at 950; see also Evans v. State, 452 So. 2d 987, 989 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).
Reversed and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
T.H. v. State, 797 So. 2d 1291 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)…for the fight was jealousy. There was no evidence of knowing or intentional conduct designed to disrupt a school function or activity. Also, no school function or activity was taking place at the time and location of the fight. Unlike A.C. v. State, 479 So. 2d 297 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), appellant did not pick a fight with students waiting to go home on the school bus; transportation of students to and from school is clearly part of the administration of an educational institution under section 877.13(1). See id.…
-
Ricardo v. State, 481 So. 2d 1296 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)…oper basis for departing from the guidelines. See Hendrix v. State, 475 So. 2d 1218 (Fla.1985) (defendant’s prior convictions which had been scored in arriving at presumptive sentence may not be considered as reason for departure); Wilkins v. State, 479 So. 2d 297 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (trial court may not rely on prior charges for which defendant not convicted as justification for upward departure from sentencing guidelines); Beauvais v. State, 475 So. 2d 1342 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (defendant’s apparent untruthful…
-
M.M. v. State, 997 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008)…ions of any educational institution, school board, or activity on school board property in this state. The fact that M.M.’s actions occurred after classes formally ended is not disposi-tive. That argument was addressed and rejected in AC. v. State, 479 So. 2d 297 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). AC. involved a fight between non-students and students, while the students were waiting for a school bus to take them home. The court found that the safe transportation of students to and from school was integral to the administr…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Jenkins v. State, 444 So. 2d 947 (Fla. 1984)
- Scott v. State, 469 So. 2d 865 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)
- Cannada v. State, 472 So. 2d 1296 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)
- Days INN OF Am. & Scott Wetzel Servs. v. Blanner, 477 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)
- Evans v. State, 452 So. 2d 987 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
- Surface v. Horton, 452 So. 2d 987 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)