THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
EDWARD J. WINTER, JR., RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Conditional Guilty Plea For Consent Judgment cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Upon the filing of a conditional guilty plea for consent judgment, this Court appointed a referee to conduct a hearing regarding Winter’s alleged misconduct. The conditional plea for consent judgment * acknowledges his violation of Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(4) and (5) and 7-106(C)(7) of the Code of Professional Responsibility. The referee recommended that Winter be found guilty in accordance with his conditional plea and that he be given a public reprimand.
Neither side contests the referee’s report which we hereby adopt. Publication of this opinion in Southern Reporter will serve as the public reprimand.
Judgment for costs in the amount of $547.90 is hereby entered against respondent, for which sum let execution issue.
It is so ordered.
ADKINS, Acting C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur. *
We feel it unnecessary to publish the full text of the plea. The Court file is open for inspection.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (25 total)
-
Davis v. State, 661 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. 1995)…nt.” § 921.001(6), Fla.Stat. (1983); rule 3.701(d)(ll). Two weeks later, relying on our decision in Jackson, we stated that the trial court, contemporaneously with the sentencing, must provide written reasons for a departure sentence. State v. Oden, 478 So. 2d 51 (Fla.1985). It was these two decisions that we relied on in reaching our decision in Ree.. Further, as we acknowledged in Smith, the failure to file any written findings and the failure to file contemporaneous written findings are closely related an…
-
REE v. State, 565 So. 2d 1329 (Fla. 1990)…78 So. 2d 1054 (Fla.1985). In Jackson, we held that the trial court’s failure to enter written reasons required the appellate court to vacate the departure sentence and remand for resentencing. Id. at 1055-56. In the companion case of State v. Oden, 478 So. 2d 51, 51 (Fla.1985) (quoting Oden v. State, 463 So. 2d 313, 314 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)), we approved the First District’s holding that “[i]t was reversible error for the trial court to depart from the guidelines without providing a contemporaneous written…
-
State v. Colbert, 660 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 1995)…We disagree. While some may question the wisdom of Ree, we find no reason to second-guess that decision today. Our holding in Ree was the logical extension of our earlier decisions in State v. Jackson, 478 So. 2d 1054 (Fla.1985), and State v. Oden, 478 So. 2d 51 (Fla.1985). The arguments the State asserts were well understood at the time of the Ree decision. As later explained in State v. Lyles, 576 So. 2d 706 (Fla.1991), Ree was intended to address the concern that if written reasons for departure are not…
Previewing 3 of 25 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence