WESLEY E. MCMILLAN, JR. AND MARGERY MCMILLAN, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS/CROSS- APPELLEES,

v.

SPENCE H. PASS AND ELIZABETH A. PASS, HIS WIFE, AND MONROE COUNTY, APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS

Citator

Cited By

• Padron v. Plantada, 632 So. 2d 113 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)
  …f the A.I.B. loan commitment at an unspecified floating rate did not mirror the terms of the parties’ agreement and thus constituted a counteroffer, which rejected the original contract terms. See U.S. Drug Discount Corp. v. Fried-Lackey Realty Co., 483 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Mintzberg v. Golestaneh, 390 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Because the broker failed to procure a loan commitment which complied with the terms of the agreement, the broker is not entitled to recover a brokerage fee. See McAllis…
• Harold and Dorothy Sticht v. Shull, 543 So. 2d 395 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)
  …took title alone. All of which has little probative value in proving the point we are involved with, i.e., Frederick’s ability to close. In this respect, the present case is not unlike the case of U.S. Drug Discount Corp. v. Fried-Laskey Realty Co., 483 So. 2d 459 (Fla.1986), wherein the court rejected the broker’s attempt to prove the ability of the contract purchaser by evidence of the ability of a third person not a party to the contract but one who “had only an expectant interest as a future partner of th…

Authorities Cited

• Waterman v. Smith, 94 So. 2d 186 (Fla. 1957)
• Anderson v. Town OF Groveland, 113 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959)
• Howard v. State, 165 So. 2d 412 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964)