KENNETH ALLEN MCDONALD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
KENNETH ALLEN MCDONALD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
485 So. 2d 20
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1986)
Caution
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
LETTS, Judge.
The rehearing motion is granted and the opinion of January 29, 1986, is withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted:
The sole issue meriting discussion is whether the trial court erred in making an assessment pursuant to section 960.17, Florida Statutes (1983). Since the appellant, an indigent, was not given adequate notice and a full opportunity to object to the assessment as required by Jenkins v. State, 444 So. 2d 947 (Fla.1984), the imposition of costs was improper. The imposition of the assessment is reversed, without prejudice and the cause is remanded for further proceedings regarding the assessment of costs, consistent with this opinion.
We find no merit in the other points on appeal.
DOWNEY and DELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lundell v. Lundell, 629 So. 2d 1013 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)…ication. We reverse. [*1014] Depending upon the particular facts and circumstances, a provision requiring one former spouse to provide health insurance to the other may be in the nature of an unmodifiable property settlement, e.g., Wilson v. Wilson, 485 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); In re Markizer, 66 B.R. 1014 (Bkrtcy. S.D.Fla.1986), or it may be in the nature of a modifiable support obligation. E.g., Putnam v. Putnam, 226 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 234 So. 2d 118 (Fla.1969); Fisher v. Fisher,…
-
Sitek v. Sitek, 486 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)…ony, we affirm. Witter v. Witter, 443 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Wolfe v. Wolfe, 424 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Feldman v. Feldman, 317 So. 2d 136 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); see Boyd v. Boyd, 478 So. 2d 356 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); cf. Wilson v. Wilson, 485 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (agreement requiring husband pay sum to wife whether or not wife remarries not agreement for payment of alimony but rather non-modifiable “pure property settlement agreement”); Bassett [*57] v. Bassett, 464 So. 2d 1203, 1210 (Fla.…
Authorities Cited
- Jenkins v. State, 444 So. 2d 947 (Fla. 1984)