MARC H. MARGULIES AND LINDA B. MARGULIES, INDIVIDUALLY, PETITIONERS,
v.
PILAR GUTIERREZ AND MARCELLA GUTIERREZ, INDIVIDUALLY, RESPONDENTS
MARC H. MARGULIES AND LINDA B. MARGULIES, INDIVIDUALLY, PETITIONERS,
PILAR GUTIERREZ AND MARCELLA GUTIERREZ, INDIVIDUALLY, RESPONDENTS
486 So. 2d 58
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1986)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The order sought to be reviewed, one denying the petitioners’ motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution, is not reviewable by certiorari. Arvida Corp. v. Hewitt, 416 So. 2d 1264 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Bowl America Florida, Inc. v. Schmidt, 386 So. 2d 1203 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Chalfonte Development Corp. v. Beaudoin, 370 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). See also Cluster v. Scott, 474 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Bowl Am. Fla., Inc. v. Schmidt, 386 So. 2d 1203 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
- Edwards v. Lawyers Title Guar. Fund, 370 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- Wenk v. Tsiotis, 370 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979)
- Arvida Corp. v. The Honorable Robert S. Hewitt & Jon Earhart, 416 So. 2d 1264 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)
- Pelicie v. State, 474 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
- Cluster v. Scott, 474 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)