MYLES J. TRALINS AND NIKKI N. TRALINS, APPELLANTS,
v.
LEONARD PEARL AND EDITH PEARL, HIS WIFE, MICHAEL A. BERKE AND FROMBERG, FROMBERG, GROSS & SHORE, P.A., A FLORIDA PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION, APPELLEES
MYLES J. TRALINS AND NIKKI N. TRALINS, APPELLANTS,
LEONARD PEARL AND EDITH PEARL, HIS WIFE, MICHAEL A. BERKE AND FROMBERG, FROMBERG, GROSS & SHORE, P.A., A FLORIDA PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION, APPELLEES
488 So. 2d 871
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1986)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of appellants’ motion and appellees’ cross-motion to review the trial court’s order granting a stay pending review, and agreeing that appellees’ motion has merit, Proprietors Insurance Co. v. Valsecchi, 385 So. 2d 749 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), we deny appellants’ motion and grant appellees’ cross-motion. Accordingly, we vacate the trial court’s order without prejudice to the posting of a bond pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.310(b)(1).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cruise Quality Painting & Cigna Ins. Cos. v. Paige, 564 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)…n the ordinary circumstance of a second accident aggravating or exacerbating a previous permanent condition, compensable or otherwise. On the other hand, as previously held by this court in City of Fernandina Beach v. School Board of Nassau County, 488 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), we have construed the statutory language of section 440.42(3) to allow the judge to order “apportionment” between carriers, i.e. in the sense of reimbursement, not only of medical benefits but of temporary disability benefits as…1 / 2
-
Grand BAY Hotel & Am. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Nerida Guerra & Home Ins. Co., 605 So. 2d 134 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)…authority to consider a washout settlement as to one carrier prior to apportionment. We would also note that the cases of Structural Systems v. Worthen, 463 So. 2d 502 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), and City of Fernandina Beach v. School Bd. of Nassau County, 488 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), relied on by appellant, involve disputes concerning apportionment of compensation benefits due prior to MMI. Those benefits are specifically not apportionable as to a dispute between the carrier and employee pursuant to § 440.15…
-
Fla. Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Fibercon Indus., Inc., 491 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…ith the disability.” Once the claimant attained maximum medical improvement, the deputy commissioner was free to apportion compensation and medical benefits between the respective carriers. City of Fernandina Beach v. School Board of Nassau County, 488 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Flagship National Bank of Broward County v. Hinkle, 479 So. 2d 828 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Hayward Trucking, Inc. v. Aetna Insurance Co., 466 So. 2d 437 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Deseret Ranches v. Crosby, 461 So. 2d 295 (Fla. 1st DCA 1…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Proprietors Ins. Co. v. John and Janet Valsecchi, 385 So. 2d 749 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)