SHELBY A. JONES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Appellant’s first point on appeal is merit-less, see Ragland v. State, 358 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), and thus we affirm the judgment. However, as there is a variance between the sentencing portion of the judgment and the order placing Jones on probation, we remand for correction or clarification of the sentence imposed herein.
The court adjudicated appellant guilty of the burglary and petit theft offenses, and orally placed him on two years probation without specifying whether this disposition pertained to the burglary or petit theft adjudication. To add to the ambiguity, the written judgment exemplified imposition of two years probation for both offenses jointly; whereas, the written probation order designated two years probation specifically for burglary, without mention of the petit theft offense.
Affirmed, but remanded for sentence clarification.
RYDER, C.J., and FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Reed v. State, 192 So. 3d 641 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)…n 775.082(10)’s passage, a court’s upward departure based on an offender’s danger to the public alone was impermissible. See Keys v. State, 500 So. 2d 134, 136 (Fla.1986); see also Ready v. State, 657 So. 2d 53, 53 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Reid v. State, 488 So. 2d 913, 915 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Angle v. State, 604 So. 2d 34, 35 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Odom v. State, 561 So. 2d 443, 445 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Morgan v. State, 528 So. 2d 991, 992 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Mendenhall v. State, 511 So. 2d 342, 342 (Fla. 5th DCA…
-
Alexander v. State, 513 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)…n for departure was that Alexander was a drug dealer. This fact is an inherent component of one of the charges, i.e., possession of cocaine with intent to sell, and thus cannot be a basis for departure. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11); Reid v. State, 488 So. 2d 913 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). The third reason for departure was that Alexander was a habitual offender. However, he was never formally adjudicated by the trial judge to be a habitual offender. Because the judge used the phrase “habitual offender” in his wri…
-
Weathers v. State, 508 So. 2d 1332 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)…, “threat to society” and “disregard for criminal justice system” are invalid reasons for departure under the facts of this case. See Williams v. State, 492 So. 2d 1308 (Fla.1986); Hendsbee v. State, 497 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Reid v. State, 488 So. 2d 913 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Martinez-Diaz v. State, 484 So. 2d 633 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). Cf. Santana v. State, 507 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) (“lack of respect for the law” valid reason for departure where defendant did not appear for disposition of delive…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Ragland v. State, 358 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)