VERONE MARIN FEHLHABER, APPELLANT,
v.
ROBERT F. FEHLHABER, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF FRED R. FEHLHABER, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1986-09-16
No. 85-1222
Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and HUBBART, JJ.
493 So. 2d 1124 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1986) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Abrams v. Paul, 453 So. 2d 826 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); In Re Estate of Lonstein, 433 So. 2d 672 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); In Re Estate of Eisenberg, 433 So. 2d 542 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Estate of Conger v. Conger, 414 So. 2d 230 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); In Re Estate of Simon, 402 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); In Re Estate of Griffis, 399 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); In Re Estate of Murphy, 336 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); In Re Estate of Lunga, 298 So. 2d 420 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); In re Estate of Serrill, 159 So. 2d 246 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Hiss v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 515 So. 2d 322 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
    …as not responsible for this arguably confusing and dangerous setting,2 the summary judgment for the County is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings. Reversed and remanded. . Both Spinelli and Haas are cited in Beyer v. Nelson, 493 So. 2d 1124 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). . The County urges that the plaintiffs abandoned all theories of the County’s responsibility concerning the barricades except the theory that the County had failed to inspect and thus learn that the developer had removed the…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw