ART CRAWFORD, JR., APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Holmes v. State, 565 So. 2d 824 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)
  …ent right to remain silent. The officer’s testimony was a recounting of what transpired during the questioning rather than a comment on appellant’s right to remain silent. See Minnis v. State, 505 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). Cf. Crawford v. State, 494 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). We distinguish Starr v. State, 518 So. 2d 1389 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), wherein Starr was never afforded the opportunity to invoke his right to remain silent as he was never given his Miranda warnings. Nor do we find merit in appel…
• Branley McCARTNEY v. State, 510 So. 2d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
  …. Miller gave general testimony, in any event, concerning the defendant’s impairment of “judgment” and mental state in answer to other questions propounded by defense counsel. See Zuber v. State, 500 So. 2d 670 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Johnson v. State, 494 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); see also Gurganus v. State, 451 So. 2d 817 (Fla.1984). Second, the defendant complains about being unable to establish part of his psychiatric history through Dr. Miller’s testimony. Dr. Miller testified that the defendant was…
• Palos v. State, 306 So. 3d 331 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020)
  …ill allowed defense counsel access to the record to make the untimely proffer. The argument raised later in the trial, during the testimony of a different witness, was insufficient for proper preservation of the issue. See, e.g., Johnson v. State, 494 So. 2d 311, 313 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (stating that a proffer that occurred after the close of evidence “was too little, too late”). The failure to proffer the proposed question or testimony to be elicited at the time of the trial court’s denial means that the…

Authorities Cited

• State v. DiGUILIO, 491 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. 1986)
• Art Crawford, Jr. v. State, 473 So. 2d 700 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)
• Art Crawford, Jr. v. State, 491 So. 2d 1142 (Fla. 1986)