WILLIAM T. MONTGOMERY, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF KENNETH W. MONTGOMERY, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
v.
BARBARA CRIBB AND JOSEPH A. PEREZ, AS CO-PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF VIVIAN S. PEREZ, DECEASED, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the order enforcing the settlement, finding it was entered at the behest of counsel while he still represented the client.
Plaintiff's attorney dismissed an appeal after agreeing to a settlement, but the plaintiff refused to sign releases. The court then entered an order e…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Attorney Authority cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Montgomery, as the personal representative of his son’s estate, filed a wrongful death action against the personal representative of the estate of Vivian Perez. Final summary judgment was entered in favor of the Perez estate. Montgomery filed an appeal from the summary judgment. The attorneys for the parties agreed to settle the case for $5,000, and Montgomery’s attorney, David L. Perkins, caused the appeal to be dismissed. Apparently, Montgomery failed to consummate the settlement by refusing to sign the necessary releases. Therefore, the two attorneys obtained an order which directed the personal representative of the Perez estate to tender a $5,000 check to Montgomery and stated that by making such a tender they would be released from all liability arising out of the allegations of the complaint. At this point, Montgomery discharged Perkins and retained a new attorney.
Montgomery’s new attorney filed an appeal from the order enforcing the settlement. He also filed a motion seeking to reinstate the appeal which had been dismissed five months before, but this court denied that motion. He now argues that the order enforcing the settlement should be set aside because Montgomery never authorized Perkins to enter into the $5,000 settlement.
The wrongful death action has been irreparably terminated, and the statute of limitations has long since expired. Moreover, the order enforcing the settlement was entered at the behest of Perkins at a time when Perkins still represented Montgomery. Under the circumstances, we have no alternative but to affirm. How ever, the question of whether or not Montgomery authorized the settlement has never been determined. Therefore, our ruling is without prejudice to any action Montgomery may wish to pursue against Perkins for purportedly settling his case and dismissing his appeal without the authority to do so.
Affirmed.
DANAHY, C.J., and GRIMES and HALL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kirkland v. State, 509 So. 2d 1105 (Fla. 1987)…GRIMES, Justice. We review Kirkland v. State, 495 So. 2d 881 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), as being in direct conflict with State v. Delgado-Santos, 497 So. 2d 1199 (Fla.1986). We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Ms. Bass was badly beaten in her apartment. Thereafter, sh…
-
Palm Springs Gen. Hosp., Inc. v. Health Care Cost Containment Bd., 560 So. 2d 1348 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…sely disposed of the appellant’s application, separate from the underlying administrative dispute, to enforce the settlement agreement. See Oceanair of Florida, Inc. v. Beech Acceptance Corp., 545 So. 2d 443 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Montgomery v. Cribb, 495 So. 2d 881 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Dania Jai-Alai Palace, Inc. v. Sykes, 495 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Weinberg v. Lozman, 364 So. 2d 841 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Tripp v. Parga, 764 P. 2d 367 (Colo.App.1988). On the merits, it is entirely clear that all of the…