ANTHONY RICHARD CATINELLA, APPELLANT,
v.
GRACE MARRIAN CATINELLA N/K/A GRACE M. PEREYRA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1986-10-28
No. 86-513
Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.
497 So. 2d 681 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1986)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Following this court’s opinion and decision reported in Catinella v. Catinella, 471 So. 2d 1362 (Fla.3d DCA 1985) the matter recurred in the trial court. Upon appropriate motions, duly noticed, the trial judge reviewed the evidence and the record as it existed before the General Master and rendered a judgment for the plaintiff on support arrearages and reduced the father’s obligations of support. We find no error and affirm the modifications of the General Master’s report, each of the modifications being consistent with the responsibilities of the parties under the facts as found by the Master. Dorn v. Dorn, 434 So. 2d 348 (Fla.3d DCA 1983); Ciccarelli v. Ciccarelli, 352 So. 2d 1204 (Fla.4th DCA 1978); Vo-gel v. Vogel, 323 So. 2d 306 (Fla.3d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw