C.O. BARNARD, APPELLANT,
v.
ANN BARNARD, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1983-07-19
No. 82-1820
Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
434 So. 2d 348 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1983) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Palmar v. Palmar, 402 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Catinella v. Catinella, 497 So. 2d 681 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
    …father’s obligations of support. We find no error and affirm the modifications of the General Master’s report, each of the modifications being consistent with the responsibilities of the parties under the facts as found by the Master. Dorn v. Dorn, 434 So. 2d 348 (Fla.3d DCA 1983); Ciccarelli v. Ciccarelli, 352 So. 2d 1204 (Fla.4th DCA 1978); Vo-gel v. Vogel, 323 So. 2d 306 (Fla.3d DCA 1975). Affirmed.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw