FRED SMITH, APPELLANT,
v.
ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1986-11-20
No. 85-1563
UPCHURCH, C.J., and DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur.
497 So. 2d 985 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1986)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A timely jury trial request for a legal claim cannot be denied due to the presence of equitable claims.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant requested a jury trial in a land dispute case involving both legal and equitable claims. The trial court denied the jury trial request.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment in a land dispute case. The pleadings presented various issues to be tried by the court: one legal issue, and three equitable issues.

Because appellant timely requested a jury trial in the trespass action1 the trial court erred in lumping the legal and equitable causes of actions together and in refusing to hold a jury trial. A mixture of legal and equitable claims in the same case cannot deprive a party of a timely requested jury trial on the legal issues. Cerrito v. Kovitch, 457 So. 2d 1021 (Fla.1984); Hobbs v. Florida First Nat’l. Bank, 480 So. 2d 153 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Padgett v. First Federal Savings & Loan, 378 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). Where a dispute between two parties involves matters of both law and equity, it is within the trial court’s discretion to present the “mixed” issues to a jury for resolution of the factual disputes, or to sever the issues. Kies v. Florida Ins. Guaranty Association, Inc., 435 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.270(b). Here, there is some indication it would be best for a jury to decide, not only the trespass action (where appellant is absolutely entitled to a jury trial), but the other issues as well. Thus, it would be proper upon remand for the court to so order. REVERSED and REMANDED.

UPCHURCH, C.J., and DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur. . Trespass is an action at law. Harris v. Baden, 154 Fla. 373, 17 So. 2d 608, 612 (1944).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw