JAMES CHAPLIN, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Probation Revocation cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Chaplin appeals from an order revoking his probation. In the affidavit which initiated the revocation proceeding, seven violations of Chaplin’s conditions of probation were alleged. At the conclusion of the revocation hearing, the trial court orally found that Chaplin was guilty of three of the violations. We find that there is sufficient evidence to support such finding and that such violations justified revocation of probation.
We therefore AFFIRM but REMAND with instructions that the trial court amend the revocation order by including therein the particular violations for which the court found Chaplin guilty. See Meyer v. State, 445 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1984); Esbenshade v. State, 494 So. 2d 274 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1986). The defendant, of course, need not be present therefor. WENTWORTH, WIGGINTON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cepcot Corp. v. Dep't OF Bus. & Prof'l Reg., 658 So. 2d 1092 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)…held that the chemical treatment of a residential pool, using direct infusion of chlorine gas from a portable tank, did not require a contractor’s license. California Chem. Co. v. Department of Professional Regulation, Constr. Indus. Licensing Bd., 501 So. 2d 728 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). However, since that decision, the legislature has repeatedly amended chapter 489. In section 489.105(3), these amendments altered the definition of “contractor,” as well as the definitions of “commercial pool contractor,” “resid…
Authorities Cited
- Esbenshade v. State, 494 So. 2d 274 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)
- Steel Fabricators, Inc. v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 445 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)
- Meyer v. State, 445 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)