A.R., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
A.R., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
504 So. 2d 66
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1987)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, a juvenile, appeals from his sentence for grand theft.
Defendant’s first point on appeal is that restitution was improper. We disagree. See J.S.H. v. State, 472 So. 2d 737, 738 (Fla.1985).
Defendant’s second point, which the state concedes, is that the written order should conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement of twenty-four hours of community service work and that the term of community control should be specified m accordance with F.R. v. State, 473 So. 2d 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). We agree.
The cause is remanded for correction of the sentence in accordance with this opinion.
LEHAN, A.C.J., SANDERLIN, J., and BOARDMAN, EDWARD F., (Ret.) J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
A.L. v. State, 790 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)…n order that A.L. write a letter of apology to the victim. We agree. Since the letter of apology was not in the oral pronouncement, it must be stricken from the written judgment. Murph v. State, 666 So. 2d 197, 198 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); A.R. v. State, 504 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Accordingly, we affirm the adjudication of delinquency but remand with instructions for the trial court to enter a new disposition order that places A.L. on community control for a period of no more than one year and that delete…
-
B.R.W. v. State, 799 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)…ourt’s oral pronouncement, we agree that the disposition order must be corrected to reflect that B.R.W. was found guilty of a second-degree misdemeanor for criminal mischief. See Murph v. State, 666 So. 2d 197, 198 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); A.R. v. State, 504 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); § 806.13(1)(b)(1), Fla. Stat. (2000). Additionally, the single disposition order utilized in this case does not separately identify the maximum commitment period imposed on each of the offenses. Because the maximum period of com…
Authorities Cited
- J.S.H. v. State, 472 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 1985)
- F.R. v. State, 473 So. 2d 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)