BRADLEY T. PACE

v.

SHARESE M. PACE

Citator

Cited By

• Pace v. Sharese M. Pace, 295 So. 3d 898 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021)
  …PER CURIAM. We reverse the order finding Bradley T. Pace in contempt for the reasons we explained in Pace v. Pace, 295 So. 3d 898 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020) (Pace I). The evidence presented at the hearing in this case is essentially identical to the evidence in Pace I.1 REVERSED and REMANDED. EVANDER, C.J., ORFINGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur. 1 We observe that the trial court…
• Eadie v. Gillis (Fla. 5th DCA 2023)
  …ion “did he ask for the makeup timeshare that the court ordered on September 2, 2022.” As we discuss below, Mother’s argument fails for two reasons. II. We use an abuse of discretion standard to review the trial court’s order. See Pace v. Pace, 295 So. 3d 898, 900 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020). A. We begin by observing that a court violates due process when it awards a remedy that a party did not seek. See Daniels v. Sorriso Dental Studio, LLC, 164 So. 3d 778, 782 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015). This is true of both plea…
• Varner v. Varner (Fla. 5th DCA 2023)
  …Wolf, 296 So. 3d 479, 485 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020). “A trial court’s determination that a party is in willful contempt of court must be based upon competent substantial evidence and is subject to an abuse of discretion standard of review.” Pace v. Pace, 295 So. 3d 898, 900 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020). However, a legal error standard applies when the trial court based its contempt ruling on an erroneous reading of the prior court order. DeMello v. Buckman, 914 So. 2d 1090, 1093 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Here, the trial court…

Authorities Cited

• Pace v. Sharese M. Pace, 295 So. 3d 898 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021)