MAUDE S. VINCENT, APPELLANT,
v.
MATHIEU VINCENT, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Final Judgment Of Dissolution Of Marriage cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Because the husband failed to request an award of special equity, Gleason v. Gleason, 453 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Stetson v. Stetson, 356 So. 2d 53 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); see Hernandez v. Hernandez, 444 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), review denied, 451 So. 2d 848 (Fla.1984), and failed to prove his entitlement to a special equity, see Vandegrift v. Vandegrift, 477 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Gregg v. Gregg, 474 So. 2d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Smith v. Smith, 428 So. 2d 276, 279 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) (on rehearing), we reverse that portion of the Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage granting the husband a special equity in various assets. Our disposition of this issue makes it unnecessary to reach the remaining issues raised by appellant.
Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Hernandez v. Hernandez, 444 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
- Gregg v. Gregg, 474 So. 2d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
- Gleason v. Gleason, 453 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)
- Vandegrift v. Vandegrift, 477 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985)
- Smith v. Smith, 428 So. 2d 276 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
- Stetson v. Stetson, 356 So. 2d 53 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)