MICHAEL VINCENT THOMPSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1987-06-03
No. 86-1639
FRANK, A.C.J., and SANDERLIN and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.
508 So. 2d 38 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1987) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Michael Vincent Thompson appeals his sentence resulting from his conviction for robbery and kidnapping and also appeals the imposition of costs pursuant to sections 943.25(4), 943.25(8), and 960.20, Florida Statutes (1985).

We have considered appellant’s claim that the trial court erred in sentencing him and find that it is without merit. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are affirmed. However, because the costs were assessed without notice and opportunity to be heard, we strike the costs without prejudice to the state to reassess the costs upon notice and hearing. Jenkins v. State, 444 So. 2d 947 (Fla.1984); Burrow v. State, 487 So. 2d 77 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

FRANK, A.C.J., and SANDERLIN and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Campbell v. State, 517 So. 2d 696 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)
    …and $2.50 were assessed against Campbell. The record does not reflect that the judge imposed these costs at sentencing, nor that Campbell was given [*698] notice as required by Jenkins v. State, 444 So. 2d 947 (Fla.1984). See also Thompson v. State, 508 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Burrow v. State, 487 So. 2d 77 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). We therefore strike the costs without prejudice to the state in accordance with Jenkins. We have considered Campbell’s remaining argument that imposition of the $50,000 mandator…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw