ANTHONY WIMMER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1987-06-03
No. 86-2843
FRANK, A.C.J., and THREADGILL, J., concur.
508 So. 2d 39 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1987)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the reasons provided by the trial court for departing from the sentencing guidelines were not valid.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant was sentenced to twelve years for false imprisonment with a weapon, exceeding the presumptive guidelines range. The trial court cited psycho…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
SANDERLIN, Judge.

SANDERLIN, Judge.

Appellant challenges his twelve-year sentence for false imprisonment with a weapon. The trial court departed from the presumptive guidelines range of four and one-half to five and one-half years. We reverse.

The trial court’s written reasons for departure were psychological trauma to the victim and insufficiency of the guidelines sentence. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the psychological trauma suffered by the victim in this case was not extraordinary or unusual in the context of the offense of false imprisonment with a weapon. See Casteel v. State, 498 So. 2d 1249 (Fla.1986); Sarria v. State, 501 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Parsons v. State, 491 So. 2d 1247 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). Further, insufficiency of the guidelines sentence, as the state concedes, is not a clear and convincing reason for departure. See Williams v. State, 492 So. 2d 1308 (Fla.1986).

Because neither of the trial court’s reasons for departure is valid, we reverse appellant’s sentence and remand for resentencing within the guidelines. Because of our disposition, we need not address appellant’s remaining point on appeal. Reversed and remanded for resentencing.

FRANK, A.C.J., and THREADGILL, J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw