R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, PETITIONER,
v.
STELLA KOBALLA.
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, PETITIONER,
STELLA KOBALLA.
134 S. Ct. 2727
Supreme Court of the United States (2014)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 189 L. Ed. 2d 764 · 82 U.S.L.W. 3707
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Aycock v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 769 F.3d 1063 (11th Cir. 2014)…process to allow an Engle-progeny plaintiff to use the Engle findings to establish the conduct elements of his or her individual claims. Recently, in Walker v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 734 F. 3d 1278, 1287 (11th Cir.2013), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2727, 189 L.Ed.2d 779 (2014), this court engaged in a comprehensive analysis of the same issue, holding that the “decision of the Supreme Court of Florida to give preclusive effect to the approved findings from Phase I [of Engle] did not arbitrarily depr…
-
Graham v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 857 F.3d 1169 (11th Cir. 2017)…esponse to Walker 0] explained that Florida law requires mutuality of parties, which Douglas [III] and [Walker] lack,” the panel had no choice but to correct its error. Petition for Writ of Certio-rari at 18 n.2, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Walker, 134 S.Ct. 2727 (No. 13-1193). But rather than abandon its analysis, which had been premised upon a fundamental misunderstanding of Florida law, the panel stuck to its inapposite guns. Instead of “giv[ing] full faith and credit to the decision in Douglas [III] ”…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Gibbs v. State, 99 So. 3d 630 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)
- R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Koballa, 99 So. 3d 630 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)