R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
STELLA KOBALLA, APPELLEE
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, APPELLANT,
STELLA KOBALLA, APPELLEE
99 So. 3d 630
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2012)
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
*631ON MOTION FOR WRITTEN OPINION
We grant the motion for written opinion, withdraw our previous per curiam decision and affirm in all respects. Regarding Appellant’s due process argument, we agree with the decision of the Second District in Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Douglas, 83 So.3d 1002 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012). We certify the following question of great public importance to the supreme court:
DOES ACCEPTING AS RES JUDICA-TA THE EIGHT PHASE I FINDINGS APPROVED IN ENGLE V. LIGGETT GROUP, INC., 945 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 2006), VIOLATE THE TOBACCO COMPANIES’ DUE PROCESS RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION?
PALMER and COHEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Koballa., 134 S. Ct. 2727 (U.S. 2014)
Authorities Cited
- Howard A. Engle, M.D. v. Liggett Grp., Inc., 945 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. 2006)
- Thompson v. State, 83 So. 3d 1002 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)
- Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. James L. Douglas for the Estate of Charlotte M. Douglas, 83 So. 3d 1002 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)