STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
ROBERTA TROTTER A/K/A ROBERTA WALKER, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the trial court's reasons for downward departure from sentencing guidelines were not clear and convincing. The case is remanded for resentencing within the guidelines and imposition of the statutory maximum penalty.
The state appealed a downward departure sentence for felony petit theft where the presumptive guidelines sentence was significantly higher than the st…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Presumptive Guidelines Sentence cases and more on FLexlaw
BARFIELD, Judge.
The state has appealed a downward departure sentence for felony petit theft. The presumptive guidelines sentence was 9 to 12 years. The statutory maximum was 5 years. The two reasons for departure relied on by the trial court are not clear and convincing. On remand, the trial court is to resentence within the guidelines, Williams v. State, 492 So. 2d 1308 (Fla. 1986), and impose the statutory maximum penalty, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(10). REVERSED and REMANDED.
In this case the trial court has been directed to sentence within the guidelines. In Johnson v. State, 503 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), we permitted the trial judge to reconsider departure because the sole reason given for departure was approved by the district court at the time sentence was imposed but later held invalid by the supreme court. Other decisions of this court have directed sentencing within the guide lines or remanded for resentencing. We certify to the supreme court the following question as one of great public importance:
DOES WILLIAMS V. STATE, 492 S0.2D 1308 (FLA.1986) REQUIRE THAT ALL CASES IN WHICH DEPARTURE SENTENCES ARE REVERSED BECAUSE NO REASONS STATED BY THE TRIAL JUDGE ARE FOUND TO BE VALID BE REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS TO SENTENCE WITHIN THE GUIDELINES?
ERVIN and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Williams v. State, 492 So. 2d 1308 (Fla. 1986)
- Johnson v. State, 503 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)