DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Adjudication Of Delinquency cases and more on FLexlaw
ORFINGER, Judge.
In committing the child involved in these proceedings to the custody of the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) after an adjudication of delinquency, the trial court ranked two of the three placement options submitted by HRS, but refused to rank the third option. The refusal of the trial judge to rank all the placement options presented by HRS is in violation of the mandatory dictates of section 39.09(3)(e), Florida Statutes (1985). See In Re Interest of K.J.M., a child, 495 So. 2d 241 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). Because the trial judge cannot select the placement options but can only rank them in priority order, and because the “training school” option was not ranked as either priority one or priority two, it should have been ranked as priority three, and the order appealed from is hereby modified so as to reflect such third ranking. As so modified, the order is affirmed.
AFFIRMED as modified.
DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (17 total)
-
Morton v. State, 517 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987)…PER CURIAM. The judgment and sentence herein are affirmed, without prejudice however, to the right of the defendant to present the cost issue to the trial court for correction. See Reynolds v. State, 516 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). AFFIRMED. DAUKSCH, ORFINGER and COWART, JJ., concur.…
-
Barker v. State, 518 So. 2d 450 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)…holding there was in conflict with the holding in Outar v. State, 508 So. 2d 1311 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987), which declared that failure to follow the Jenkins requirements is fundamental error and may always be raised on appeal. But see Reynolds v. State, 516 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987) (En Banc). Recently, the First District Court of Appeal held that failure to follow the Jenkins requirements produces an illegal sentence as far as costs are concerned, so that the issue can be addressed on appeal without a conte…
-
Crancy Scrivens v. State, 518 So. 2d 458 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988)…PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Reynolds v. State, 516 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). UPCHURCH, C.J., and COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur.…
Previewing 3 of 17 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Lovette v. State, 495 So. 2d 241 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986)