CHRISTOPHER PAUL MORTON, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Haifa Y. Alkhoury v. Basem J. Alkhoury, 54 So. 3d 641 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)
  …roof upon the movant. As a general rule, permanent injunctions, which remain indefinitely in effect, may be modified by a court of competent jurisdiction “whenever changed circumstances make it equitable to do so.... ” Hale v. Miracle Enters. Corp., 517 So. 2d 102, 103 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). The requirement to show changed circumstances applies equally to modification or dissolution of a protective injunction. See Knight v. Waters, 786 So. 2d 1289 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Simonik v. Patterson, 752 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 3…
• Simonik v. Patterson, 752 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)
  …the circumstances justifying the injunction, and those terms are subject to alteration when those circumstances change. See Eastern Fed. Corp. v. State Office Supply Co., Inc., 646 So. 2d 737, 741 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Hale v. Miracle Enters. Corp., 517 So. 2d 102, 103 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). In the absence of evidence that the circumstances have changed, we find no abuse of discretion in the denial of the motion to modify. Affirmed.…
• E. Fed. Corp. v. State Off. Supply Co., Inc., 646 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
  …d DCA 1963). The terms of a permanent injunction must be confined to what is required by the circumstances justifying the injunction, and those terms are subject to alteration when those circumstances change. Hale v. Miracle Enterprises Corporation, 517 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). We affirm the trial court’s finding that appellee was entitled to a permanent injunction based upon appellant’s pattern of unreasonably rejecting proposed subtenants. After careful consideration of the record and arguments of th…

Authorities Cited

• Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. State, 516 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987)