STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,

v.

TERRY CECIL, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• THE Florida BAR v. Lawless, 640 So. 2d 1098 (Fla. 1994)
  …hat a public reprimand is sufficient because this Court has imposed public reprimands in other cases involving a lawyer’s failure to supervise non-lawyer employees. See, e.g., The Fla. Bar v. Fields, 520 So. 2d 272 (Fla.1988); The Fla. Bar v. Armas, 518 So. 2d 919 (Fla.1988); The Fla. Bar v. Carter, 502 So. 2d 904 (Fla.1987); The Fla. Bar v. Van Deventer, 368 So. 2d 48 (Fla.1979). [*1101] We disagree with both the Bar and Lawless. This Court in general “deals more severely with cumulative misconduct than with…
• State v. Cesaero Brea, 530 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 1988)
  …, in which the district court certified the same question of great public importance framed in State v. Amagada, 508 So. 2d 1247 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), quashed, 518 So. 2d 918 (Fla.1988), and State v. Cecil, 508 So. 2d 1249 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), quashed, 518 So. 2d 919 (Fla. 1988).1 We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Brea was charged with trafficking in cocaine and conspiracy to traffic in cocaine, in violation of sections 893.03(2)(a) and 893.-135, Florida Statutes (1985). Brea filed two pretri…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• State v. Diamond, 553 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
  …tinuing viability of Smith insofar as its approval of certiorari as an appropriate remedy for addressing an error of this kind, a review of the following cases should remove any such doubt: State v. Pettis, 520 So. 2d 250 (Fla.1988); State v. Cecil, 518 So. 2d 919 (Fla.1988); State v. Filipowich, 528 So. 2d 511 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1988). I can think of no more deserving case for the exercise of certiorari jurisdiction than this where there has clearly been a violation of established law resulting in a miscarriage o…

Authorities Cited

• State v. Pettis, 520 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 1988)
• State v. Cecil, 508 So. 2d 1249 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)