WALT DISNEY WORLD CO., A DELAWARE CORPORATION AND COLUMBIA CASUALTY COMPANY AND LLOYDS OF LONDON, PETITIONERS,
v.
MARIETTA GOODE, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JOEL GOODE, ON BEHALF OF MARIETTA GOODE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND HARRY GOODE, INDIVIDUALLY, RESPONDENTS
WALT DISNEY WORLD CO., A DELAWARE CORPORATION AND COLUMBIA CASUALTY COMPANY AND LLOYDS OF LONDON, PETITIONERS,
MARIETTA GOODE, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JOEL GOODE, ON BEHALF OF MARIETTA GOODE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND HARRY GOODE, INDIVIDUALLY, RESPONDENTS
520 So. 2d 270
Florida Supreme Court (1988)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We accepted jurisdiction to review Walt Disney World Co. v. Goode, 501 So. 2d 622 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), because of apparent conflict with decisions of other district courts of appeal. Upon closer examination, we find that the alleged conflict cases are distinguishable and we lack jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review as improvidently granted.
It is so ordered.
EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur. OVERTON, J., concurs in result only.
McDOÑALD, C.J., dissents.
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ENTERTAINED BY THE COURT. SEE FLA.R.APP.P. 9.330(d).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hawk v. Seaboard Sys. R.R., Inc., 547 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)…bviously to exceed the maximum limit of a reasonable range within which the jury may properly operate. [Citations omitted.] 349 So. 2d 1181, 1184-1185. See, e.g., Walt Disney World Co. v. Goode, 501 So. 2d 622 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), review dismissed, 520 So. 2d 270 (Fla.1988) (where the court affirmed a $1,000,000 damage award to each parent of a four-year-old child who drowned). As the supreme court acknowledged in Winner v. Sharp, 43 So. 2d 634 (Fla.1949): Those who have not brought a child into the world a…
-
Citrus Cnty. v. McQUILLIN, 840 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)…discretion may set aside the verdict. Brown v. Estate of Stuckey, 749 So. 2d 490 (Fla.1999); Tobias; Waddell v. Shoney’s, Inc., 664 So. 2d 1134 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Walt Disney World Co. v. Goode, 501 So. 2d 622 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), rev. dismissed, 520 So. 2d 270 (Fla.1988). In refusing to overturn this verdict, the trial judge noted the child had testified at length at trial regarding his grief and pain caused by the loss of his mother’s companionship, how close they were, and how her loss had affected his…
-
Carnegie v. State, 564 So. 2d 233 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)…nd the court may consider the applicability of an habitual offender sentence under section 775.084, Florida Statutes, as it existed at the time of appellant’s offense. See Holmes v. State, 502 So. 2d 1302 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), pet. for rev. dismissed 520 So. 2d 270 (Fla.1988). The sentencing guidelines score-sheet which the court utilized included a computation for legal constraint at the time of the offense. It has been established that the constraint from which an offender escapes should not be separately…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Walt Disney World Co. v. Marietta Goode, 501 So. 2d 622 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986)