CHRIS SCOTT PERILLO, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CHRIS SCOTT PERILLO, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
522 So. 2d 101
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1988)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
A trial court may not use as a reason to enhance a criminal sentence an element that has already been factored into the sentencing guidelines. State v. Mischler, 488 So. 2d 523 (Fla.1986). Therefore, the sentence under review is reversed with directions to resentence the defendant within the appropriate guidelines.
Reversed and remanded with directions.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Robby K. Robison, 629 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)…y redetermination of the paternity of the child.” Pelella v. Pelella, 604 So. 2d 14, 15 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); See also Singletary v. Hardemon, 595 So. 2d 277 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Vereen v. Vereen, 581 So. 2d 1004 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Biddle v. Salozzo, 522 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Narcisi v. Brusko, 510 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Decker v. Hunter, 460 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Van Nostrand v. Olivieri, 427 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Johnson v. Johnson, 395 So. 2d 640 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). [*10…
-
Pelella v. Pelella, 604 So. 2d 14 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)…dissolution of marriage is res judicata and, therefore, bars any redetermination of the paternity of the child. See Singletary v. Hardemon, 595 So. 2d 277 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Vereen v. Vereen, 581 So. 2d 1004 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Biddle v. Salozzo, 522 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Narcisi v. Brusko, 510 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Hess v. Hess, 466 So. 2d 1179 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 476 So. 2d 674 (Fla.1985); Decker v. Hunter, 460 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Van Nostrand v. Olivieri, 427 So.…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Mischler, 488 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 1986)