PAULA C. PELELLA A/K/A PAULA K. CARHARTT, APPELLANT,
v.
NOEL A. PELELLA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1992-08-11
No. 91-2931
Before NESBITT, JORGENSON and GODERICH, JJ.
604 So. 2d 14 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1992) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*15] PER CURIAM.

The final judgment of dissolution of marriage is res judicata and, therefore, bars any redetermination of the paternity of the child. See Singletary v. Hardemon, 595 So. 2d 277 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Vereen v. Vereen, 581 So. 2d 1004 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Biddle v. Salozzo, 522 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Narcisi v. Brusko, 510 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Hess v. Hess, 466 So. 2d 1179 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 476 So. 2d 674 (Fla.1985); Decker v. Hunter, 460 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Van Nostrand v. Olivieri, 427 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Johnson v. Johnson, 395 So. 2d 640 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Robby K. Robison, 629 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)
    …ring the parties divorce proceedings, determined to have been born of the parties marriage. “The final judgment of dissolution of marriage is res judicata and, therefore, bars any redetermination of the paternity of the child.” Pelella v. Pelella, 604 So. 2d 14, 15 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); See also Singletary v. Hardemon, 595 So. 2d 277 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Vereen v. Vereen, 581 So. 2d 1004 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Biddle v. Salozzo, 522 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Narcisi v. Brusko, 510 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. 2d DCA…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw