BETTY L. BLOCK, APPELLANT,
v.
HOWARD JOHNSON COMPANY AND SCHINDLER HAUGHTON ELEVATOR CORPORATION, APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Dober v. Worrell, 401 So. 2d 1322 (Fla.1981); Roffman v. Sears Roebuck and Co., 522 So. 2d 31 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Otis Elevator Company v. Chambliss, 511 So. 2d 412 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Anderson v. Walthal, 468 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Highlands Insurance Company v. Gilday, 398 So. 2d 834 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); F & R Builders v. Lowell Dunn Company, 364 So. 2d 826 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Palmer v. Thomas, 284 So. 2d 709 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973); Jackson v. Whitmire Construction Company, Inc., 202 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967); Bernstein v. Highland Associates of Worchester, Inc., 1 Mass.App. 132, 294 N.E. 2d 576 (1973).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Schindler Corp. v. Timm Ross, 625 So. 2d 94 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)…t apply to a mislevel-ing case. Hafferman v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 653 F.Supp. 423, 433 (D.D.C.1986);2 Bernstein v. Highland Assocs., Inc., 1 Mass. App. 132, 294 N.E. 2d 576 (1973)3, cited in support of affirmance in Block v. Howard Johnson Co., 524 So. 2d 472 (Fla.3d DCA 1988). See generally Otis Elevator Co. v. Chambliss, 511 So. 2d 412 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) (res ipsa inapplicable when customer failed to show that sudden stop of escalator would be “ordinarily” caused by Otis’s negligence). While there is…
-
Hitchcock v. Hitchcock, 992 So. 2d 436 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)…te the marital assets equally, we reverse and remand for the trial court to reconsider its award of attorney’s fees and costs based on the parties’ relative financial circumstances regarding their need and ability to pay. See Bernstein v. Bernstein, 524 So. 2d 472, 473 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988) (stating that how marital assets have been divided is relevant, though not controlling, in awarding attorney’s fees). We affirm as to the husband’s remaining issues on appeal, as well as to the wife’s issue on cross-appeal.…
-
Angeline Bachman v. Bachman, 566 So. 2d 19 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)…t’s motion for temporary suit money and attorney's fees. It is well settled that a trial court must consider fully the financial circumstances of both parties before making a determination as to attorney’s fees and costs. See Bernstein v. Bernstein, 524 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). Here, we find that the trial court did not conduct a hearing sufficient to make such a determination. The record does not support the trial court’s conclusion that “neither party has the ability to pay additional fees and costs…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Chirogianis v. Anderson, 401 So. 2d 1322 (Fla. 1981)
- Highlands Ins. Co. v. Gilday, 398 So. 2d 834 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
- Dick Palmer v. Thomas, 284 So. 2d 709 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973)
- Jackson v. Whitmire Constr. Co., Inc., 202 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967)
- Seneca B. Anderson and Martha P. Anderson v. Walthal, 468 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)
- City OF W. Palm Beach v. Lipkin, 468 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)
- Otis Elevator Co. v. Lelia Chambliss and Avon Chambliss, 511 So. 2d 412 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)
- Roffman v. Sears, 522 So. 2d 31 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
- F & R Builders v. The Lowell Dunn Co. & Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 364 So. 2d 826 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
- Williams v. State, 364 So. 2d 826 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)