CHARLES R. STACK, APPELLANT,
v.
GUARDIAN OIL COMPANY, APPELLEE
CHARLES R. STACK, APPELLANT,
GUARDIAN OIL COMPANY, APPELLEE
525 So. 2d 447
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1988)
Caution
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Haas v. Haas, 59 So. 2d 640 (Fla.1952); Lederer v. Perry, First, Reiher, Lemer & Quindel, 511 So. 2d 608 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Dusesoi v. Dusesoi, 498 So. 2d 1348 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Baron v. Baron, 454 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Ratner v. Hensley, 303 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Est. OF George B. Walters, Sr. v. Edwards, 700 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)…1976); Barnett First Nat’l Bank of Jacksonville v. Cobden, 393 So. 2d 78, 80 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). This intent is to be given full force and effect to the extent possible so long as it does not violate the law or public policy. See Adkins v. Woodfin, 525 So. 2d 447 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). Both parties agree that the directive in the will to satisfy the mortgages on the 40th Street property is unambiguous. Neither party argued to the trial court that the will was ambiguous nor attempted to present extrinsic eviden…
-
The Fine Arts Museums Found. v. First Nat'l IN Palm Beach, 633 So. 2d 1179 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)…ase. If the record raises the slightest doubt that an issue might exist, then summary judgment is improper. Holland v. Verheul, 583 So. 2d 788, 789 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). Determining whether a will is ambiguous is a question of law. Adkins v. Woodfin, 525 So. 2d 447, 448 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). Essential to the resolution of that legal question is the factual question of whom Testator intended to receive the devise to the “De Young Museum Art School.” Testator’s will is not patently ambiguous because the will’s l…
-
Robinson v. Robinson, 676 So. 2d 511 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)…s nothing in these provisions demonstrates any possible alternative constructions of the trust’s provisions, the trial court was constrained by the four corners of the trust and erred by accepting evidence of the grantor’s intent. Adkins v. Woodfin, 525 So. 2d 447 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Souder v. Johnson, 501 So. 2d 745 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Campbell v. Campbell, 489 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). We find no error as to any other issues raised. DELL and KLEIN, JJ., concur. . We deem inapposite Appellants’ cha…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Edmond Jordan Dusesoi v. Dusesoi, 498 So. 2d 1348 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)
- Sanford Ratner v. Willa Mae Hensley, 303 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
- Baron v. Baron, 454 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)
- Lederer v. Perry, 511 So. 2d 608 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)