MAX LEE HYDER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Court reversed summary denial of motion to correct illegal sentence where appellant alleged enhancement based on uncounseled prior conviction, requiring trial court to attach record portions conclusively refuting the allegation or proceed to answer and hearing.
A trial court must attach record portions that conclusively refute allegations of sentence enhancement based on uncounseled prior convictions before summarily denying a motion to correct an illegal sentence.
[1] A trial court must attach portions of the record that conclusively refute allegations in a motion to correct an illegal sentence before summarily denying the motion; if t…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellant moved to correct his sentence, alleging it was illegally enhanced based on a prior uncounseled conviction.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Uncounseled Convictions cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks review of the trial court’s summary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. Appellant alleged in his motion that his sentence is illegal because it was enhanced, at least in part, on the basis of a prior uncounseled conviction. If this allegation is true, then appellant may be entitled to relief. See United States v. Tucker, 404 U.S. 443, 92 S.Ct. 589, 30 L.Ed.2d 592 (1972); Washington v. State, 442 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Lloyd v. State, 346 So. 2d 1075 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). The trial court, however, failed to attach portions of the record which conclusively refute appellant’s allegations.
Accordingly, we reverse the summary denial of appellant’s motion and remand the case to the trial court. On remand, unless the case files and records conclusively show that appellant is not entitled to relief, the trial court shall order the state to file an answer. After receipt of the answer, the trial court shall determine whether an evidentiary hearing is required. If the trial court should summarily deny the motion again, it shall attach such portions of the record which conclusively refute appellant’s allegations. Appellant will have thirty days in which to appeal.
DANAHY, C.J., and FRANK and PARKER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McCABE v. McCABE, 600 So. 2d 1181 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)…a at the time the action was brought or that the wife resided in Florida prior to the commencement of the dissolution action. This failure renders the husband’s service of process upon the wife under Florida’s long-arm statute void.3 Feder v. Feder, 526 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Hargrave v. Hargrave, 495 So. 2d 904 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Laney v. Laney, 487 So. 2d 1109 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Mouzon v. Mouzon, 458 So. 2d 381 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).4 On remand, the husband must amend his petition for dissolution…
-
Carter Todd Peyton Jenkins v. Jenkins, 556 So. 2d 441 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)…band, a New York resident, claimed former wife’s petition for dissolution failed to allege sufficient facts to meet the statutory-requirements for long-arm jurisdiction over a nonresident and thereby rendered service of process void. Feder v. Feder, 526 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Rand v. Rand, 491 So. 2d 1293 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). Section 48.193(1)(e), Florida Statutes (1987), states jurisdiction obtains only if the parties maintained a matrimonial domicile in the state at the time of commencement of the a…
-
Weiler v. Alexandria G. Weiler, 861 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)…g arm statute, specific allegations demonstrating the jurisdictional facts must be alleged. McMahan. Failure to adequately allege the relevant jurisdictional basis voids any attempted service under the long-arm statute. Id. See also Feder v. Feder, 526 So. 2d 780, 781 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Plummer v. Hoover, 519 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Mouzon v. Mouzon, 458 So. 2d 381, 383 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). In this case, the wife only alleged that the parties “maintained a matrimonial domicile in the state”; there…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- United States v. Tucker, 404 U.S. 443 (U.S. 1972)
- Lloyd v. State, 346 So. 2d 1075 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977)
- Washington v. State, 442 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)