NIXON
v.
TRUMP
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The district court dismissed a 197-page complaint filed by Kathy Nixon against 779 defendants, including the President, Supreme Court justices, and numerous judges and government officials, alleging involvement in a RICO human trafficking conspiracy. The court found the complaint incomprehensible and patently frivolous, dismissing it without leave to amend and warning the plaintiff of potential sanctions for future frivolous filings.
The complaint is dismissed as frivolous without leave to amend. The court found the complaint incomprehensible, with theories that are utterly frivolous, patently ludicrous, and a waste of the court's time.
“Plaintiff's complaint is incomprehensible, and her theories are "utterly frivolous, patently ludicrous, and a waste of . . . the court's time, which is being paid by hard-earned tax dollars."”
Establishes the court's finding that the complaint lacks merit and is a waste of judicial resources.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePlaintiff Kathy Nixon filed a 197-page complaint naming 779 defendants, including the President of the United States, each of the United States Suprem…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Rico Claims cases and more on FLexlaw
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Kathy Nixon's complaint, filed on July 10, 2025. (Doc. 1). The case was reassigned to the undersigned after a judge in the Fort Myers Division recused himself and directed that the case be reassigned to a judge in the Tampa Division. (Doc. 4). After review of the complaint, court file, and record, the Court finds as follows:
In her 197-page complaint, Plaintiff sues 779 defendants, including the President of the United States, each of the United States Supreme Court justices, 89 other judges, and numerous agencies, entities, government officials, lawyers, and individuals based on their purported involvement in some sort of vast RICO human trafficking conspiracy. Plaintiffs complaint is incomprehensible, and her theories are “utterly frivolous, patently ludicrous, and a waste of . . . the court's time, which is being paid by hard-earned tax dollars." See Young v. PNC Bank, N.A., No. 3:16cv298/RV/EMT, 2018 WL 1251920, at *2 (N.D. Fla. Mar. 12, 2018) (citing Roach v. Arrisi, No. 8:15-cv-2547-Т-33АЕР, 2016 WL 8943290, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 7,
2016)). This case is patently frivolous and due to be dismissed, without leave to amend.
Plaintiff is warned that if she continues to file frivolous cases of this nature in this Court, she may be subject to sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(c), including monetary sanctions or injunctive relief directing the Clerk to not accept future filings by Plaintiff without first obtaining prior leave of the Court.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED:
1. Plaintiff Kathy Nixon's complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS, without leave to amend.
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and thereafter close this case.
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Tampa, Florida, on this 13th day of August, 2025.
hp.Bl
TOM BARBER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Nixon v. Trump (M.D. Fla. 2025)…ludicrous, and a waste of . . . the court's time, which is being paid by hard-earned tax dollars." See Young v. PNC Bank, N.A., No. 3:16cv298/RV/EMT, 2018 WL 1251920, at *2 (N.D. Fla. Mar. 12, 2018) (citing Roach v. Arrisi, No. 8:15-cv-2547-T-33AEP, 2016 WL 8943290, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 7, ---PAGE 2--- Case 2:25-cv-00604-TPB-CPT Document 7 Filed 08/13/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID 199 2016)). This case is patently frivolous and due to be dismissed, without leave to amend. Plaintiff is warned that if she continue…1 / 2
-
Longs Bey v. Sec'y, Dep't of Treas. (M.D. Fla. 2025)…ries espoused by sovereign citizens have been consistently rejected as “utterly frivolous, patently ludicrous, and a waste of . . . the court's time, which is being paid by hard-earned tax dollars.” See Young v. PNC Bank, N.A., No. 3:16cv298/RV/EMT, 2018 WL 1251920, at *2 (N.D. Fla. Mar. 12, 2018) (citing Roach v. Arrisi, No. 8:15-cv-2547-T-33AЕР, 2016 WL 8943290, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 7, 2016)). Consequently, this case is dismissed with prejudice as frivolous. ---PAGE 2--- Case 8:25-cv-01394-TPB-CPT Document…1 / 2
-
Colella v. Rogers (M.D. Fla. 2025)…ous. See United States v. Sterling, 738 F. 3d 228, 233 (11th Cir. 2013). Plaintiff does not refer to himself as a sovereign citizen, but his filings “bare all the hallmarks of the sovereign citizen theory.” Young v. PNC Bank, N.A., No. 3:16-cv-298, 2018 WL 1251920, at n.1 (N.D. Fla. Mar. 12, 2018). Plaintiff places his thumb print on his filings, describes himself as a "living 3 ---PAGE 4--- Case 5:25-cv-00293-SPC-PRL Document 4 Filed 05/12/25 Page 4 of 6 PageID 57 man" and "of the House of Colella," and us…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Nixon v. Trump (M.D. Fla. 2025)