MILLER BREWING COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO, AND BEER INDUSTRY OF FLORIDA, INC., APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
Miller Brewing Company appeals a final order of the circuit court which found that Miller, a Wisconsin brewer, was subject to the provisions of section 563.022, Florida Statutes (1987). Before briefing was completed, however, the parties filed a joint motion to vacate and remand, showing that the 1988 Florida Legislature has amended the statutory provisions here at issue so as to render this appeal moot. Accordingly, we grant the motion and reverse and remand to the trial court with directions to dismiss the complaint as moot, Fritz v. City of Hialeah, 411 So. 2d 973 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
SMITH, C.J., and JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dilbert v. State, 642 So. 2d 831 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)…According to Dilbert, the sentencing court found that since a void judgment had been entered against him, he was entitled to seven months’ jail credit, representing the time he served after the imposition of the void sentence. See Taylor v. Dugger, 527 So. 2d 891 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Falagan v. Wainwright, 195 So. 2d 562 (Fla.1967); Vellucci v. Cochran, 138 So. 2d 510 (Fla.1962). Dilbert’s claim is not conclusively refuted by the court’s order and attachments; therefore, this matter is remanded for further…
-
Cazares v. State, 127 So. 3d 828 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)…aw we must hold that the trial court erred in increasing Mr. Cazares’ sentences on the sexual-activity charges because Mr. Ca-zares had already begun to serve his sentences on those charges. See Ashley, 850 So. 2d at 1265; see also Taylor v. Dugger, 527 So. 2d 891, 892 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988) (“[0]nce the first sentence was vacated, the consecutive sentence must be calculated from the date it was imposed, not from the date the first sentence was vacated.” (citing Falagan v. Wainwright, 195 So. 2d 562 (Fla.1967);…
-
Reynaldo A. Diaz v. State, 107 So. 3d 448 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)…llant Diaz’s right to pursue by exhaustion of administrative remedies with the Department of Corrections any right to prison credits or recalculations of his time served to which he may be entitled based on his assertions here. See Taylor v. Dugger, 527 So. 2d 891 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). Diaz has not shown that his sentence in this case is illegal for purposes of a challenge under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), and is not claiming entitlement to jail time credit in his motion. He has failed to demo…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Fritz v. City OF Hialeah, 411 So. 2d 973 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)