WAYNE DILBERT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the trial court's summary denial of the motion to correct sentence was improper because the claim for jail credit was not conclusively refuted by the record.
Wayne Dilbert appealed the denial of his motion to correct sentence, claiming he was promised seven months of jail credit orally, but the written sent…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Void Judgment cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Wayne Dilbert appeals the summaiy denial of his motion to correct sentence claiming jail credit was not awarded according to the terms of his plea agreement. Although the written sentence reflects an award of seven days’ jail credit, Dilbert insists that the trial court orally announced he was to receive credit for seven months. We reverse and remand.
According to Dilbert, the sentencing court found that since a void judgment had been entered against him, he was entitled to seven months’ jail credit, representing the time he served after the imposition of the void sentence. See Taylor v. Dugger, 527 So. 2d 891 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Falagan v. Wainwright, 195 So. 2d 562 (Fla.1967); Vellucci v. Cochran, 138 So. 2d 510 (Fla.1962).
Dilbert’s claim is not conclusively refuted by the court’s order and attachments; therefore, this matter is remanded for further consideration. The trial court may again deny the motion if it attaches the plea hearing transcript or other documentation which rebuts Dilbert’s allegation. Alternatively, the court shall conduct an evidentiary hearing.
Reversed and remanded.
PARKER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hair v. State, 17 So. 3d 804 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)…of material fact. The circuit court’s other basis for denial of the motion, that the handgun accidentally fired while being used as a club, is erroneous as a matter of law. See Williams v. State, 588 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); McInnis v. State, 642 So. 2d 831 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Fowler v. State, 492 So. 2d 1344 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Diaz v. State, 387 So. 2d 978 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). CONCLUSION Petitioner was aware that Harper, the victim, had unlawfully and forcibly entered the vehicle when he was shot.…
-
Keyes v. State, 804 So. 2d 373 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)…he accidental infliction of an injury and the defense of self defense or defense of another are so intertwined that the jury could reasonably find that the accident [*376] resulted from the justifiable use of force.” Id,.; see also McInnis v. State, 642 So. 2d 831, 832 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Here, Keyes’ attorney argued that it was Cardarelli who initiated contact with his client and that any contact Keyes made with Cardarelli was unintentional and, thus, not battery. Additionally, defense counsel argued that a…
-
Roberts v. State, 753 So. 2d 136 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)…n the use of nondeadly force; however we reject this argument. Because the record before us indicates that Roberts failed to present any evidence in support of his theory of self-defense, a special instruction was not in order. See McInnis v. State, 642 So. 2d 831 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Although Roberts failed to file a motion to correct this sentence below, the sentencing error he alleges is serious and patent on the face of the record and may therefore be reviewed for the first time on direct appeal. See Fla…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Falagan v. Louie L. Wainwright, 195 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 1967)
- Vellucci v. Cochran, 138 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 1962)
- Miller Brewing Co. v. Fla. Dep't OF Bus. Reg., 527 So. 2d 891 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)