FINAL EXPENSE DIRECT
v.
PYTHON LEADS, LLC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court recommended denying the motion for default judgment against Ali Raza without prejudice.
Plaintiff moved for a default judgment against Defendant Ali Raza. The case involves multiple defendants, and some have not defaulted.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Inconsistent Judgments cases and more on FLexlaw
Plaintiff Final Expense Direct moves for entry of a default judgment against Defendant Ali Raza. (Doc. 70). Generally, a court may enter a default judgment when the factual allegations of the complaint, which are assumed to be true, provide a sufficient legal basis for such entry. Nishimatsu Constr. Co. v. Houston Nat'l Bank, 515 F. 2d 1200, 1206 (5th Cir. 1975) (“The defendant is not held to admit facts that are not well-pleaded or to admit conclusions of law."). Therefore, in considering a motion for default judgment, a court must "examine the sufficiency of the allegations in the complaint to determine whether the plaintiff is entitled to” a default judgment. Fid. & Deposit Co. v. Williams, 699 F. Supp. 897, 899 (N.D. Ga. 1988).
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b) provides that where, as here, a clerk's default has been entered, a plaintiff may apply to either the clerk or the 1
court for a default judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). A default judgment may then be awarded if “there is ‘a sufficient basis in the pleadings for the judgment entered." Surtain v. Hamlin Terrace Found., 789 F. 3d 1239, 1245 (11th Cir. 2015) (per curiam) (quoting Nishimatsu Constr. Co., Ltd. v. Houston Nat'l Bank, 515 F. 2d 1200, 1206 (5th Cir. 1975)).
Rule 54(b) states, however, that in a lawsuit involving multiple parties, "the court may direct entry of a final judgment as to one or more, but fewer than all, claims or parties only if the court expressly determines that there is no just reason for delay." Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) (emphasis added). The "preferred practice” in multi-defendant actions where only some defendants are in default is to withhold granting a default judgment against those defendants until there is an adjudication on the merits as to the non-defaulted defendants. N. Pointe Ins. Co. v. Glob. Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc., No. 6:12-cv-476-Orl-31TBS, 2012 WL 5378826, at *4 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 4, 2012) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). Courts that have taken this approach have done so, at least in part, to avoid inconsistent judgments. See, e.g., Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Bailey, 378 F. Supp. 3d 1213, 1221 (M.D. Ga. 2019) (citing Gulf Coast Fans, Inc. v. Midwest Elecs. Imps., Inc., 740 F. 2d 1499, 1512 (11th Cir. 1984)); Northfield Ins. Co. v. Browning Timber & Saw Mill, LLC, No. 4:17-cv-01236- ACA, 2018 WL 3135970, at *2 (N.D. Ala. June 27, 2018); Zurich Am. Ins. Co. 2
v. Ednic Trading Corp., No. 13-62229-CIV, 2014 WL 869216, at *1 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 5, 2014) (citations omitted).
Thus, for the reasons above, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that First Response Direct's motion for entry of default judgment against Ali Raza (Doc. 70) be DENIED without prejudice.
ENTERED in Tampa, Florida, on May 8, 2025.
Amanda Arnold Samone
AMANDA ARNOLD SANSONE
United States Magistrate Judge
NOTICE TO PARTIES
The parties have fourteen days from the date they are served a copy of this report to file written objections to this report's proposed findings and recommendations or to seek an extension of the fourteen-day deadline to file written objections. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); 11th Cir. R. 3-1. A party's failure to object timely under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) waives that party's right to challenge on appeal the district court's order adopting this report's unobjected-to factual findings and legal conclusions. 11th Cir. R. 3-1. 3
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (18 total)
-
Final Expense Direct v. Python Leads, LLC, 699 F. Supp. 897 (M.D. Fla. 2025)…ions of law."). Therefore, in considering a motion for default judgment, a court must "examine the sufficiency of the allegations in the complaint to determine whether the plaintiff is entitled to” a default judgment. Fid. & Deposit Co. v. Williams, 699 F. Supp. 897, 899 (N.D. Ga. 1988). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b) provides that where, as here, a clerk's default has been entered, a plaintiff may apply to either the clerk or the 1 ---PAGE 2--- Case 8:23-cv-02093-WFJ-AAS Document 115 Filed 05/08/25 Pag…1 / 3
-
Int'l Painters & Allied Trades Indus. Pension Fund v. Aragones, 643 F. Supp. 2d 1329 (M.D. Fla. 2008)…ue to the default, actually state a substantive cause of action and that there is a substantive, sufficient basis in the pleadings for the particular relief sought.” Tyco Fire, 218 Fed.Appx. at 863; Fid. & Deposit Co. of Md. v. Williams, 699 F.Supp. 897, 899 (N.D.Ga.1988). Moreover, allegations relating to the amount of damages are not admitted by virtue of default, and the court must determine the amount and character of damages to be awarded. Miller v. Paradise of Port Richey, Inc., 75 F.Su…
-
Infinity Cap. Income Fund, LLC v. Nguyen (M.D. Fla. 2025)…nclusions of law.").² Therefore, in considering a motion for default judgment, a court must "examine the sufficiency of plaintiff's allegations to determine whether plaintiff is entitled to" a default judgment. Fid. & Deposit Co. of Md. v. Williams, 699 F. Supp. 897, 899 (N.D. Ga. 1988). A complaint need not contain detailed factual allegations, “but it demands more than an unadorned, the-defendant-unlawfully-harmed-me accusation. A pleading that offers 'labels and conclusions' or 'a formulaic recitation of th…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 18 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Nishimatsu Constr. Co., Ltd. v. Houston Nat'l Bank, 515 F.2d 1200 (5th Cir. 1975)
- Portia Surtain v. Hamlin Terrace Found., 789 F.3d 1239 (11th Cir. 2015)
- Final Expense Direct v. Python Leads, LLC, 699 F. Supp. 897 (M.D. Fla. 2025)