CARIBBEAN HYPERBARIC MEDICINE, LLC
v.
MEUSE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish subject-matter jurisdiction because the complaint and supplemental evidence did not adequately allege the citizenship of all parties, thus diversity jurisdiction was not met.
Plaintiffs sued defendants for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and fraudulent inducement. After defendants failed to appear, a default was ente…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Article Iii Jurisdiction cases and more on FLexlaw
Caribbean Hyperbaric Medicine, LLC, and Dr. Tyler Sexton sue Barry Meuse and his company, Crystal Creek Healthcare Capital LLC, in connection with an agreement between the parties to start a medical business. See generally Compl. (Doc. 2). Because the plaintiffs fail to establish subject-matter jurisdiction, this action is dismissed. [fn 1]
Dr. Sexton and Caribbean sue Meuse and Crystal Creek for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and fraudulent inducement in connection with an effort to open a hyperbaric medicine¹ business. See Compl. ¶¶ 36–59. The defendants failed to appear after
being properly served, see (Docs. 7, 11), and the clerk entered a default against them, (Doc. 17). Dr. Sexton and Caribbean then moved for the entry of default judgment. (Doc. 23).
The Magistrate Judge returned a Report and Recommendation recommending entry of judgment in favor of the plaintiffs in the amount of $1,844, 641.60 plus interest, as well as attorney's fees. R&R (Doc. 31).
After reviewing the record, I ordered the plaintiffs to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. (Doc. 32). Particularly, I ordered the plaintiffs to explain why the complaint adequately alleged the parties' citizenship, and I permitted them to "submit... affidavits or other evidence showing diverse citizenship." Id. Dr. Sexton and Caribbean have availed themselves of the opportunity, but their evidence does not establish diversity jurisdiction.
A "court must ensure that it has jurisdiction over the parties" before it enters default judgment. Bykov v. Idiatulin, No. 8:23-CV-1420-TGW, 2024 WL 2304371, at *3 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 27, 2024). Jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship requires complete diversity between the parties—no defendant may be a citizen of the same state as any plaintiff, and vice versa. See Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 7 U.S. (3 Cranch) 267, 267–68 (1806) (Marshall, C.J.); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). A natural person is a citizen of the place they are domiciled (that is, the last place where they were present and intended to remain indefinitely). McCormick v. Aderholt, 293 F. 3d 1254, 1257-58 (11th Cir. 2002) (per
2
curiam). Mere residence is insufficient to establish citizenship. Travaglio v. Am. Exp. Co., 735 F. 3d 1266, 1269 (11th Cir. 2013). An unincorporated entity like an LLC is a citizen of all the states of which its members are citizens. Rolling Greens MHP, L.P. v. Comcast SCH Holdings L.L.C., 374 F. 3d 1020, 1022 (11th Cir. 2004) (per curiam). Any deficiency in the pleading of diversity jurisdiction may be disregarded if the plaintiff submits evidence that shows that Article III jurisdiction exists. Travaglio, 735 F. 3d at 1269.
To start, Dr. Sexton and Caribbean's complaint fails to allege diversity jurisdiction. It fails entirely to allege Dr. Sexton's citizenship, and as it alleges that he is Caribbean's sole member, see Compl. ¶ 1, it fails to allege Caribbean's citizenship as well. As for the defendants, the complaint alleges only Meuse's residence. Id. ¶ 2. And even if it alleged Meuse's citizenship, it does not allege that he is Crystal Creek's sole member. Id. ¶¶ 2-3. It is thus impossible to tell from the complaint whether diversity jurisdiction exists.
The plaintiffs' supplemental evidence establishes more, but still not enough. The recent filing establishes the plaintiffs' citizenship. Dr. Sexton's affidavit explains that by July 2023 he was present in Florida and intended to remain there indefinitely. Sexton Aff. (Doc. 35-1) at 2. Combined with his allegation that he is Caribbean's sole member, that makes both Dr. Sexton and Caribbean Florida citizens. See Rolling Greens MHP, L.P., 374 F. 3d at 1022; McCormick, 293 F. 3d at 1257–58. But that is as far as the new evidence goes. While a screenshot of Crystal Creek's website tends to show that Meuse and Sally Engel
3
are its members, (Doc. 35-2) at 9, the evidence does not establish the citizenship of either. A process server's affidavit tends to show that Engel resided in Evanston, Illinois as of March 19, 2024. (Doc. 35-3) at 1 (“Direct neighbor confirms Sally Engel to currently reside at location."). But residence is insufficient to establish citizenship. See Travaglio, 735 F. 3d at 1269. And even if the evidence were sufficient as to Engel, Dr. Sexton and Caribbean offer no evidence of Meuse's citizenship. While their brief claims that “Meuse was a citizen of Virginia at the time of filing," (Doc. 35) at 6, "a sentence in an unsworn brief is not evidence," Travaglio, 735 F. 3d at 1269. The plaintiffs therefore fail to show the defendants' citizenship.
The plaintiffs thus fail to establish subject-matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, the following is ORDERED:
1. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subjectmatter jurisdiction.
2. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 31) is REJECTED AS MOOT.
3. The Motion for Final Default Judgment (Doc. 23) is DENIED AS MOOT.
4. The clerk is directed to TERMINATE any pending deadlines and to CLOSE this case.
4
ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on March 25, 2025.
Kathryn Kimball Mizelle United States District Judge
5
[fn 1]: Hyperbaric [o]xygen [t]herapy involves the inhalation of 100 [percent] oxygen at increased atmospheric pressures.” United States v. Healogics, Inc., No. 614CV283ORL31KRS, 2016 WL 2744949, at *2 (M.D. Fla. May 11, 2016). It can be used to treat a variety of conditions. See id.; see also Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy, CLEVELAND CLINIC (last visited Mar. 24, 2025), https://perma.cc/68KZ-WYVF.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Caribbean Hyperbaric Med., LLC v. Meuse, 2016 WL 2744949 (M.D. Fla. 2025)…usiness. See Compl. ¶¶ 36–59. The defendants failed to appear after 1 "Hyperbaric [o]xygen [t]herapy . . . involves the inhalation of 100 [percent] oxygen at increased atmospheric pressures.” United States v. Healogics, Inc., No. 614CV283ORL31KRS, 2016 WL 2744949, at *2 (M.D. Fla. May 11, 2016). It can be used to treat a variety of conditions. See id.; see also Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy, CLEVELAND CLINIC (last visited Mar. 24, 2025), https://perma.cc/68KZ-WYVF. ---PAGE 2--- Case 8:24-cv-00684-KKM-AAS Docume…
Authorities Cited
- Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 3 Cranch 267 (U.S. 1806)
- Rolling Greens MHP, L.P. v. Comcast SCH Holdings L.L.C., 374 F.3d 1020 (11th Cir. 2004)
- McCORMICK v. Aderholt, 293 F.3d 1254 (11th Cir. 2002)
- Tina arie Travaglio v. Am. Express Co., 735 F.3d 1266 (11th Cir. 2013)
- Caribbean Hyperbaric Med., LLC v. Meuse, 2016 WL 2744949 (M.D. Fla. 2025)