DASSAULT SYSTEMES SOLIDWORKS CORPORATION
v.
LINEAR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING CORP
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Court grants Plaintiff's motion for entitlement to attorney fees and expenses.
Plaintiff obtained a default judgment against Defendants for copyright infringement and related claims. Plaintiff now seeks attorney fees and litigati…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Copyright Infringement cases and more on FLexlaw
This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiff's Motion for Entitlement to Attorney Fees and Expenses. (Doc. 46). Plaintiff initiated this action against Defendants for copyright infringement, circumvention of technological measures, and breach of contract, seeking damages arising from the impermissible use of its protected software (Doc. 1). Defendants failed to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, and on July 8, 2024, a default judgement in favor of Plaintiff on all counts was entered in the amount of $730,000. (Doc. 44). Plaintiff now seeks reimbursement of its attorney's fees and litigation expenses. (Doc. 46).
Local Rule 7.01 prescribes a bifurcated procedure for determining attorney's fees, noting that "[a] party claiming post-judgment attorney's fees and related nontaxable expenses must obtain an order determining entitlement before providing a supplemental motion on amount.” M.D. Fla. R. 7.01(a). Under the Copyright Act,
a court may award reasonable attorney's fees to the prevailing party in a copyright action at its discretion. 17 U.S.C. § 705; see also InDyne, Inc. v. Abacus Tech. Corp., 587 F. App'x 552, 554 (11th Cir. 2014); Dubay v. King, No. 3:17-CV-348-J-20MCR, 2021 WL 7209882, at *3 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 22, 2021); Caracol Television, S.A. v. Telemundo Television Studios, LLC, No. 18-23443-CIV, 2022 WL 17583608, at *7 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 4, 2022). In deciding whether to award attorney's fees, courts should consider the following factors: frivolousness, motivation, objective unreasonableness, and the need in particular circumstances to advance considerations of compensation and deterrence. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc., 510 U.S. 517, 534 n.19 (1994); MiTek Holdings, Inc. v. Arce Eng'g Co., 198 F. 3d 840, 842 (11th Cir. 1999).
Here, as evidenced by the entry of default, the litigation was not frivolous but rather the result of Defendant's continued impermissible use of Plaintiff's protected software. Moreover, awarding fees furthers deterrence and provides Plaintiff just compensation for the expenses associated with vindicating its rights. Thus, the weight of the factors falls in favor of awarding fees. See McDermott v. El Sol Media Network, Inc., No. 6:22-CV-999-PGB-DAB, 2023 WL 2931277, at *5 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 8, 2023), report and recommendation adopted, No. 6:22-CV-999-PGB-DAB, 2023 WL 2931202 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 23, 2023) (“Fees and costs of suit are commonly awarded by courts in copyright infringement default cases.") Accordingly, having reviewed Plaintiff's motion and the filings therein, this Court finds that Plaintiff is entitled to the reasonable attorney's fees and costs expended during the course of this litigation.
ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's Motion for Entitlement to Attorney Fees and Expenses. (Doc. 46) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff shall file a supplemental motion for attorney's fees and costs that complies with Local Rule 7.01(c).
DONE AND ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on this 8th day of August 2024.
ANTHONY E. PORCELLI
United States Magistrate Judge cc: Counsel of Record
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dassault Systemes SolidWorks Corp. v. Linear Eng'g & Mfg. Corp, 2021 WL 7209882 (M.D. Fla. 2024)…so InDyne, Inc. v. Abacus Tech. Corp., 587 F. App'x 552, 554 (11th Cir. 2014); Dubay v. King, No. 3:17-CV-348-J-20MCR, 2021 WL 7209882, at *3 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 22, 2021); Caracol Television, S.A. v. Telemundo Television Studios, LLC, No. 18-23443-CIV, 2022 WL 17583608, at *7 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 4, 2022). In deciding whether to award attorney's fees, courts should consider the following factors: frivolousness, motivation, objective unreasonableness, and the need in particular circumstances to advance considerations of…1 / 2
-
Conley v. Vacanti (S.D. Fla. 2026)…Cir. 2014). A “‘prevailing defendant does not need to establish that the plaintiff acted in bad faith or brought a frivolous suit’ in order to be entitled to an award of fees.” Caracol Tele., S.A. v. Telemundo Tele. Studios, LLC, No. 18-CV-23443, 2022 WL 17583608, at *3 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 4, 2022) (quoting Brandon v. New Power Gen., LLC, No. 15-CV-22738, 2018 WL 1795468, at *1 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 31, 2018)). “Where a defendant is the prevailing party in a copyright case, the presumption in favor of awarding fees to…1 / 3
-
Blue Chip Alliance, LLC v. Chetu, Inc. (S.D. Fla. 2025)…er and $500 for a senior associate are reasonable); CITGO Petroleum Corp., 2022 WL 17718802, at *4–5 (holding that fees of $850 for a partner and $700 for an associate are reasonable); Caracol TV, S.A. v. Telemundo TV Studios, LLC, No. 18-23443-CIV, 2022 WL 17583608 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 4, 2022) (recommending fees of $765 for work by a partner and $415 for an associate); Global Digit. Solutions, Inc. v. Bolzan, No. 18-80106-CV, 2021 WL 7630524 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 13, 2021) (reducing requested rates for attorneys from $1…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Mitek Holdings v. Arce Eng'g Co., 198 F.3d 840 (11th Cir. 1999)
- Dassault Systemes SolidWorks Corp. v. Linear Eng'g & Mfg. Corp, 2021 WL 7209882 (M.D. Fla. 2024)