CRESSWELL
v.
UNITED STATES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a motion to compel a non-party's deposition must include proof of service on that non-party.
The United States moved to compel the deposition of a non-party, Park Place Surgery Center. The motion did not state whether it was served on the non-…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion To Compel Deposition cases and more on FLexlaw
This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following motion filed herein:
MOTION: UNOPPOSED MOTION TO COMPEL (Doc. No. 36) FILED: July 15, 2024
THEREON it is ORDERED that the motion is DENIED without prejudice.
The United States moves to compel the deposition of the corporate representative of a non-party, Park Place Surgery Center. Doc. No. 36. Upon review, however, the motion does not state whether it was served on non-party Park Place Surgery Center, by certificate of service or otherwise. Accordingly, the
motion (Doc. No. 36) is DENIED without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(d)(2)(B)(i) (requiring "notice to the commanded person"); Roca Labs, Inc. v. Consumer Opinion Corp., No. 8:14-cv-2096-T-33EAJ, 2015 WL 12939597, at *1 (M.D. Fla. June 17, 2015) (denying without prejudice motion to compel regarding nonparty subpoena that did not state that the motion was served on the non-party).
DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on July 19, 2024.
Leslie Hoffman Price LESLIE HOFFMAN PRICE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties
-2-
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cresswell v. United States (M.D. Fla. 2024)…otherwise. Accordingly, the motion (Doc. No. 36) is DENIED without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(d)(2)(B)(i) (requiring “notice to the commanded person”); Roca Labs, Inc. v. Consumer Opinion Corp., No. 8:14-cv-2096-T-33EAJ, 2015 WL 12939597, at *1 (M.D. Fla. June 17, 2015) (denying without prejudice motion to compel regarding non- party subpoena that did not state that the motion was served on the non-party). DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on July 19, 2024. [ inlay ie ayn…
Authorities Cited
- Cresswell v. United States (M.D. Fla. 2024)