T.T. INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD
v.
BMP INTERNATIONAL, INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Court grants Defendants' Motion to Stay Pending Appeal, finding that an interlocutory appeal divests the district court of jurisdiction over the appealed issues.
Defendants moved to stay proceedings pending their interlocutory appeal of the district court's denial of their motion to compel arbitration. Plaintif…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Divestiture Of Jurisdiction cases and more on FLexlaw
Before the Court is BMP International, Inc., BMP USA, Inc., iGas USA, Inc., and iGas Holdings, Inc.’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Stay Pending Appeal (Dkt. 60). T.T. International Co., Ltd. (“Plaintiff”) has responded in opposition (Dkt. 62) and Defendants have replied (Dkt. 64). Upon careful consideration, the Court grants Defendants’ Motion.
DISCUSSION
On April 4, 2023, Defendants filed a motion seeking to compel arbitration, which the Court later denied on the basis of waiver. Dkts. 30 & 46. Defendants filed an interlocutory appeal challenging the Court’s arbitrability ruling shortly thereafter. Dkt. 56. Now, Defendants move to stay proceedings pending their appeal. Dkt. 60. Defendants argue that Coinbase, Inc. v. Bielski, No. 22-105, 2023 WL 4138983 (U.S. June 23, 2023), leaves the Court without discretion to deny a requested stay.
Id. at 4. Plaintiff argues that the Court can, and should, deny Defendants’ requested stay based on frivolity considerations. Dkt. 62 at 3. The Court is constrained by the Coinbase Court’s reiteration of the rule that
“[a]n appeal, including an interlocutory appeal, ‘divests the district court of its control over those aspects of the case involved in the appeal.’” 2023 WL 4138983 at *3. And the Court in Coinbase discussed Plaintiff’s contention about frivolous appeals and discounted it, at least vis-a-vis trial court stays. Id. at *5.
Plaintiff is concerned that this appeal is taken to delay collection of the large underlying judgment, by enabling fraudulent conveyances, in effect permitting a “bust out” of the judgment debtor’s assets. This is a real concern; especially when one views the scant merits of this appeal. To this concern the Coinbase Court stated, “the courts of appeals possess robust tools to prevent unwarranted delay and deter frivolous interlocutory appeals.” Id. Employment of those robust tools may be indicated here.
The stay motion, Dkt. 60, is GRANTED. DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida, on July 13, 2023. /s/ William F. Jung
WILLIAM F. JUNG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
COPIES FURNISHED TO: Counsel of Record
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
T.T. Int'l Co., Ltd v. BMP Int'l, Inc., 2023 WL 4138983 (M.D. Fla. 2023)…. Defendants filed an interlocutory appeal challenging the Court’s arbitrability ruling shortly thereafter. Dkt. 56. Now, Defendants move to stay proceedings pending their appeal. Dkt. 60. Defendants argue that Coinbase, Inc. v. Bielski, No. 22-105, 2023 WL 4138983 (U.S. June 23, 2023), leaves the Court without discretion to deny a requested stay. Id. at 4. Plaintiff argues that the Court can, and should, deny Defendants’ requested stay based on frivolity considerations. Dkt. 62 at 3. The Court is constrained…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- T.T. Int'l Co., Ltd v. BMP Int'l, Inc., 2023 WL 4138983 (M.D. Fla. 2023)