JOHNSON
v.
EAST COAST WAFFLES

M.D. Fla. | 2023-04-24
No. 101
2019 WL 7708456 District Court, M.D. Florida (2023) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court granted the unopposed motion for leave to depose an incarcerated non-party witness.


Facts & Procedural History

Defendant filed an unopposed motion for leave to depose an incarcerated non-party witness, Al-Jalil Byrd. Plaintiff did not oppose the motion.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

BYRD (Doc. No. 101) FILED: April 19, 2023

THEREON it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. Defendant seeks leave of Court for the parties to conduct the deposition of a non-party witness who is incarcerated, Al-Jalil Byrd. Doc. No. 101. Plaintiff does not oppose. Id. at 3. Upon consideration, the Court finds the request well taken. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(A)(2)(B). See also Aviation Koncepts, Inc. v. Starr Indem. & Liab. Co., No. 19-60513-CIV, 2019 WL 7708456, at *1 (S.D. Fla. Nov. 27, 2019) (“The Court

... Should permit the deposition of an incarcerated individual unless an objecting party can show why the deposition is impermissible under [Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1)(, (2). Accordingly, the Motion (Doc. No. 101) is GRANTED, and the parties may take the deposition of Al-Jalil Byrd at a date and time agreed to by the parties. Counsel shall coordinate the deposition with the officials at Al-Jalil Byrd’s place of incarceration. Although Defendant’s Motion (Doc. No. 101) was docketed as ex parte, there is no apparent reason for the ex parte designation. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to remove the ex parte designation from the Motion (Doc. No. 101) and this Order, and to ensure that this Order is sent to counsel of record. DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on April 24, 2023.

LESLIE NOFFMAN PRICE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Johnson v. East Coast Waffles, 2019 WL 7708456 (M.D. Fla. 2023)
    …rated, Al-Jalil Byrd. Doc. No. 101. Plaintiff does not oppose. Id. at 3. Upon consideration, the Court finds the request well taken. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(A)(2)(B). See also Aviation Koncepts, Inc. v. Starr Indem. & Liab. Co., No. 19-60513-CIV, 2019 WL 7708456, at *1 (S.D. Fla. Nov. 27, 2019) (“The Court ... Should permit the deposition of an incarcerated individual unless an objecting party can show why the deposition is impermissible under [Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1)(, (2). Accordingly, the Motion (Doc.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw