LENZ

v.

THE MICHAELS ORGANIZATION

Citator

Cited By

• Lenz v. The Michaels Org., 2016 WL 1460143 (M.D. Fla. 2022)
  …ions in relevant documents is not persuasive. Contrary, the caselaw and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide for such a measure allowing for certain redactions in relevant documents. See In re: Takata Airbag Prod. Liab. Litig., No. 14- 24009-CV, 2016 WL 1460143, at *2-3 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 1, 2016) (finding that the certain categories). Specifically, Rule 26 contemplates the Court’s discretion in the discovery process. Therefore, for the reasons stated at the hearing, Defendants are not prohibited from redacti…
• Flannery v. Spirit Airlines, Inc. (S.D. Fla. 2024)
  …this scope of discovery need not be admissible in evidence to be discoverable. Id. Rule 26(b) also allows discovery “through increased reliance on the commonsense concept of proportionality.” In re: Takata Airbag Prod. Liab. Litig., No. 14-CV-24009, 2016 WL 1460143, at *2 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 1, 2016) (quoting Chief Justice John Roberts, 2015 Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary 6 (2015)). The Federal Rules afford the Court broad authority to control the scope of discovery, Josendis v. Wall to Wall Residence R…
• Davis v. Nationwide Ins. Co. of Am. (S.D. Fla. 2020)
  …eeping with the purpose of the discovery rules. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1). However, Rule 26(b) allows discovery “through increased reliance on the commonsense concept of proportionality.” In re: Takata Airbag Prod. Liab. Litig., 15–2599–MD– Moreno, 2016 WL 1460143, at *2 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 1, 2016) (quoting Chief Justice John Roberts, 2075 Year–End Report on the Federal Judiciary 6 (2015)); Reuter v. Physicians Cas. Risk Retention Group, No. 16-80581-CV, 2017 WL 395242, at *2 (S.D. Fla. Jan.…

Authorities Cited

• Lenz v. The Michaels Org., 2016 WL 1460143 (M.D. Fla. 2022)