DOE
v.
ROLLINS COLLEGE
On March 25, 2021, Defendant filed a proposed Bill of Costs, seeking $13,846.95. (Doc. 206.) Plaintiff objected the Bill of Costs, arguing Defendant failed to describe the expenses with particularity or provide proof of payment for the costs. (Doc. 208.) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman recommends sustaining in part and overruling in part Plaintiff’s objections and recommends awarding Defendant $6,467.18 in costs. (Doc. 233 (“R&R”).) No party objected to the R&R, and the time for doing so has passed. Absent objection, the Court examined the R&R only for clear error. See Wiand v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 8:12-cv-557-T-27EAJ, 2016 WL 355490, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 28, 2016); see also Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety. Itis ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. US. Magistrate Judge Leslie R. MHoffman’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 233) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made
a part of this Order. 2. Plaintiff's Objections to Defendant’s Bill of Costs (Doc. 208) are SUSTAINED in part and OVERRULED in part. 3. Defendant is AWARDED taxable costs in the amount of $6,467.18. 4, The remainder of Defendant's requested costs are DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on July 28, 2021.
® Ke el ROY B. DALTON JR: United States District Judge
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (14 total)
-
Roll v. Enhanced Recovery Co., LLC (M.D. Fla. 2021)…Judge Embry J. Kidd recommends granting the Motion. (Doc. 59 (“R&R”).) The parties do not objection to the R&R (Doc. 60), so the Court has examined the R&R only for clear error. See Wiand v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 8:12-cv-557- T-27EAJ, 2016 WL 355490, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 28, 2016); see also Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is adopted in its entirety. -1- Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. U.S. Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd’s Report…
-
Curtin v. Northrop Grumman Corp. (M.D. Fla. 2021)…g Plaintiff sued the wrong party. (Doc. 34 (“R&R”).) Plaintiff did not object to the R&R, and the time for doing so has now passed. So the Court has examined the R&R only for clear error. See Wiand v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 8:12-cv-557-T-27EAJ, 2016 WL 355490, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 28, 2016); see also Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is adopted in its entirety. -1- Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick’s Repor…
-
Brummitt v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. (M.D. Fla. 2021)…mmissioner’s decision. (Doc. 28 (“R&R”).) No party objected to the R&R, and the time for doing so has passed. Absent objection, the Court has examined the R&R only for clear error. See Wiand v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 8:12-cv-557-T-27EAJ, 2016 WL 355490, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 28, 2016); see also Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding no such error, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety. -1- It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. U.S. Magistrate Judge Leslie R. MHoffman’…
Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence