BRUMMITT
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, affirming the Commissioner's decision to deny disability benefits.
Plaintiff sought review of the Commissioner's denial of disability benefits and supplemental income payments. A Magistrate Judge recommended affirming…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Supplemental Security Income Payments cases and more on FLexlaw
In this social security appeal, Plaintiff seeks review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) decision to deny his disability benefits and supplemental income payments. (Doc. 1.) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman recommends affirming the Commissioner’s decision. (Doc. 28 (“R&R”).) No party objected to the R&R, and the time for doing so has passed. Absent objection, the Court has examined the R&R only for clear error. See Wiand v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 8:12-cv-557-T-27EAJ, 2016 WL 355490, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 28, 2016); see also Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding no such error, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety.
It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. U.S. Magistrate Judge Leslie R. MHoffman’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 28) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made
a part of this Order. 2. The Commissioner’s final decision is AFFIRMED.
3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security and against Plaintiff Michael Dale Brummitt and to close this case. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on May 24, 2021
Yj, “ROY B. DALTON JR! United States District Judge