MCDOUGALL
v.
MESACO ENTERPRISES, INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a corporation cannot appear pro se and must be represented by counsel.
Plaintiff moved to strike Defendant's answer because it was signed by the corporation's owner, who is not a licensed attorney. The owner is not a Flor…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to strike Defendant’s answer (Dkt. 10). Upon consideration, the Court grants the relief requested. Defendant is a corporation which must be represented by counsel and cannot proceed pro se. See Local R. 2.02(b)(2), M.D. Fla. (“A party, other than a natural person, can appear through the lawyer only.”).1 Plaintiff contends Defendant’s answer (Dkt. 9) is signed by the owner of the Defendant corporation, “who is not a Florida-licensed attorney” or licensed to practice before the Middle District. Dkt. 10 at 2. Plaintiff requests the answer be stricken and Defendant be required to appear through an attorney. See Colony Ins. Co. v. Total Contr. & Roofing, Inc.,
on Defendant at the following address: Mesaco Enterprises, Inc. c/o Roman Mesa, Registered Agent, 8121 Lutz Lake Fern Road, Odessa, Florida 33556. The Clerk is directed to strike the answer. DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida, on March 16, 2021. me,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
COPIES FURNISHED TO: Counsel of Record Mesaco Enterprises, Inc. c/o Roman Mesa, Registered Agent, 8121 Lutz Lake Fern Road, Odessa, FL 33556
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McDougall v. Mesaco Enters., Inc., 2010 WL 5093663 (M.D. Fla. 2021)…also Palazzo v. Gulf Oil Corp., 764 F. 2d 1381, 1385 (11th Cir. 1985) (noting that “even where the person seeking to represent the corporation is its president and major stockholder,” the corporation must secure its own counsel). No. 10-23091-Civ, 2010 WL 5093663, at *3 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 8, 2010) (striking corporation’s pro se answer and citing Palazzo v. Gulf Oil Corp., 764 F. 2d 1381, 1385 (11th Cir. 1985)). Based on the well-settled law, Plaintiff's motion (Dkt. 10) is granted. Defendant shall obtain co…
-
Southern-Owners Ins. Co. v. Tasman Servs. (M.D. Fla. 2021)…[Section] 627.4136(1) before raising a claim against National Union. Because he has not yet done so, the Court grants National Union’s Motion to Dismiss.”); see also Colony Ins. Co. v. Total Contracting & Roofing, Inc., No. 10-23091-CIV, 2010 WL 5093663, at *2 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 8, 2010) (“[T]he Smiths claim that [Section] 627.4136(1) should not apply because Colony, the insurer, initiated this action and the Smiths only raise their claims in response. However, nothing about the te…
Authorities Cited
- Palazzo v. Gulf OIL Corp., 764 F.2d 1381 (11th Cir. 1985)
- McDougall v. Mesaco Enters., Inc., 2010 WL 5093663 (M.D. Fla. 2021)