PRIOLEAU
v.
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a first-party bad faith claim is premature until liability and damages have been determined in favor of the insured.
Plaintiff filed a two-count complaint alleging an uninsured motorist claim and a first-party bad faith claim against her insurer. The defendant insure…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Premature Claim cases and more on FLexlaw
This matter is before the Court on “Government Employees Insurance Company’s Motion to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff’s Complaint,” filed by counsel on November 6, 2020. (Doc. 8). Plaintiff Samantha Prioleau did not file a response in opposition. After reviewing the motion, court file, and the record, the Court finds as follows: Plaintiff alleges she was injured on September 14, 2019, as a result of an automobile accident with an uninsured motorist on US 301 in Pasco County, Florida. On October 1, 2020, Plaintiff filed a two-count complaint against Defendant Government Employees Insurance Company in the Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit in and for Pasco County, Florida.1 The case was removed to this Court on October 30, 2020. 1 Plaintiff alleges that she was a passenger in a vehicle insured under a policy issued by Defendant. In Count I, Plaintiff asserts an uninsured motorist claim. In Count II, Plaintiff asserts a first party bad faith claim. Defendant seeks dismissal of Plaintiff’s bad faith claim in Count II and presents several arguments, including that the claim is premature. Under Florida law, a bad faith claim is premature until liability and damages have been determined in favor of the insured. See, e.g., Holmes v. GEICO Indemnity Company, No. 3:12-cv-271-J-99JBT, 2012 WL 12902911, at *3 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 5, 2012) (“Indeed, an abundance of Florida case law holds that a bad faith claim does not accrue until there has been a final determination of both liability and damages in an underlying coverage claim.”) (internal quotations omitted). A district court has discretion to either dismiss or abate a bad faith claim when simultaneously pled with a coverage action. See Shvartsman v. GEICO Gen. Ins. Co., No. 6:17-cv-437-Orl-28KRS, 2017 WL 2734083, at *1 (M.D. Fla. June 23, 2017). Here, the Court exercises its discretion to dismiss the bad faith claim in Count II without prejudice. See Bele v. 21st Century Centennial Ins. Co., 126 F. Supp. 3d 1293, 1295 (M.D. Fla. 2015). Plaintiff is not precluded from reasserting the claim following determination of the coverage and liability issues, or filing the bad faith claim as a separate proceeding after this case is concluded. In light of this ruling, the Court declines to address Defendant’s other arguments for dismissal. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: (1) “Government Employees Insurance Company’s Motion to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff’s Complaint” (Doc. 8) is hereby GRANTED. (2) Count II of the complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to any right Plaintiff may have to reassert the claim following determination of the coverage and liability issues, or to file the bad faith claim as a separate proceeding after this case is concluded. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida, this 23rd day of November, 2020.
ee Bes
TOM BARBER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Prioleau v. Gov't Emps. Ins. Co., 2012 WL 12902911 (M.D. Fla. 2020)…l arguments, including that the claim is premature. Under Florida law, a bad faith claim is premature until liability and damages have been determined in favor of the insured. See, e.g., Holmes v. GEICO Indemnity Company, No. 3:12-cv-271-J-99JBT, 2012 WL 12902911, at *3 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 5, 2012) (“Indeed, an abundance of Florida case law holds that a bad faith claim does not accrue until there has been a final determination of both liability and damages in an underlying coverage claim.”) (internal quotations…
-
Stabil Concrete Pavers, LLC v. Allied Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. (M.D. Fla. 2025)…09/16/25 Page 6 of 10 PageID 358 alongside claim for declaratory relief); Commerce & Industry Ins. Co. v. Apogee Leasing, Inc., No. 08-CIV-22581, 2009 WL 10669077, at *3 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 14, 2009) (same); Holmes v. GEICO Indem. Co., No. 3:12-cv-271, 2012 WL 12902911, at *4 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 5, 2012) (the defendant's argument that the breach of contract claim was not ripe until coverage determination had been made "warrant[ed] little discussion" because “whether the Policy was in effect and provided coverage for t…
-
Razaqyar v. Integon Nat'l Ins. Co. (M.D. Fla. 2020)…coverage and liability issues must be determined before a bad faith cause can be prosecuted.” Gen. Star Indem. Co. v. Anheuser-Busch Cos., 741 So. 2d 1259, 1261 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999); see also Holmes v. GEICO Indem. Co., No. 3:12-cv-271-J-99MMH-JBT, 2012 WL 12902911, at *3 n.2 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 5, 2012)(“[R]egardless of which type of bad faith claim Plaintiff asserts, coverage and liability issues must be determined before the bad faith cause can be prosecuted.”). Therefore, the bad faith claim is not ri…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Prioleau v. Gov't Emps. Ins. Co., 2012 WL 12902911 (M.D. Fla. 2020)