VIRGINIA BROOKS
v.
FLORIDA CANCER SPECIALIST, P.L.

M.D. Fla. | 2020-10-23
No. 2:17-cv-00418
2009 WL 928040 District Court, M.D. Florida (2020) Caution
Also reported at: 2008 WL 254127
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Footnotes
1 The parties’ stipulation provides in a footnote that Defendant Florida Cancer Specialists, P.L. was misnamed. (Doc. 48, n.1.) Upon careful review, it appears that Defendant’s business name was correct upon the filing of the initial complaint but changed after this litigation began. The Court thanks the parties for their candor and finds that the Defendant’s name change does not affect the parties’ stipulation to dismiss in any material way. See Specialty Nat. Ins. Co. v. U-Save Auto Rental of Am., No. 8:07-cv-878-T-33MAP., 2009 WL 928040, at *6 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 2, 2009) (explaining that a business entity’s name change does not, in and of itself, alter the underlying entity’s legal obligations); Salav v. Boyland Auto Orlando, LLC, No. 6:07-cv-1892-Orl-19GJK., 2008 WL 254127, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 29, 2008) (explaining that Rules 15 and 41 “involve the application of similar standards” (citation omitted)). As always, the Court appreciates the parties’ efforts to resolve disputes.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Brooks v. Fla. Cancer Specialist, P.L., 2009 WL 928040 (M.D. Fla. 2020)
    …. The Court thanks the parties for their candor and finds that the Defendant’s name change does not affect the parties’ stipulation to dismiss in any material way. See Specialty Nat. Ins. Co. v. U-Save Auto Rental of Am., No. 8:07-cv-878-T-33MAP., 2009 WL 928040, at *6 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 2, 2009) (explaining that a business entity’s name change does not, in and of itself, alter the underlying entity’s legal obligations); Salav v. Boyland Auto Orlando, LLC, No. 6:07-cv-1892-Orl-19GJK., 2008 WL 254127, at *2 (M.…
    1 / 2
  • Ruiz v. Ringling Coll. of Art & Design, Inc. (M.D. Fla. 2023)
    …To the extent there is some difficult issue of Medicare law wrapped up in this case, it ought not be decided, for all time, incidental to a state law retaliation claim.” Id. at 1270; see also Salav v. Boyland Auto Orlando, LLC, 6:07-cv-1892-PCF-GJK, 2008 WL 254127, *4 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 29, 2008) (remanding case where plaintiff alleged defendant violated Florida statutes that required compliance with federal law; finding that the “allegations of the Complaint merely require applying of federal standard…
    1 / 2
  • THI Medical v. Filmore Mgmt. Trading, LLC (S.D. Fla. 2021)
    …based in Germany, but it appears it cannot figure out the correct entity name from an internet search. And the one case cited by Plaintiff to support its position, does the opposite. That case, Specialty Nat. Ins. Co. v. U-Save Auto Rental of Am., 2009 WL 928040 at *7 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 2, 2009), found that a name discrepancy of a corporation was not material because the identity of the corporation could easily be ascertained through public records. Relying on this proposition, Plaintiff should be able to de…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw