WATERS
v.
UMA EDUCATION, INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice.
The plaintiff, proceeding pro se, moved for voluntary dismissal of her case. The defendant had filed an answer, making Rule 41(a)(1)(A) inapplicable. …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Plain Legal Prejudice cases and more on FLexlaw
COPIES FURNISHED TO: Counsel of Record and Plaintiff, pro se
1 Cf. United States ex rel. Perkins v. Wellcare Health Plans, Inc., 8:12-cv-2032-T-30AAS, 2016 WL 7665446 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 29, 2016) (dismissing case without prejudice on condition that plaintiff, upon any refiling of action, pay some of defendant’s attorney’s fees and costs in protracted litigation).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Waters v. UMA Educ., Inc., 2017 WL 6387780 (M.D. Fla. 2020)…19, 2020. Dkt. 18. This case remains in its early stages, dispositive motions have not been filed, and Defendant has not expended considerable effort or resources in defending this case. See Engle v. Celadon Grp., Inc., No. 3:16-cv- 1437-J-34JRK, 2017 WL 6387780, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Dec. 14, 2017) (dismissing without prejudice with no conditions or costs on plaintiff because case was in early stage and no dispositive motions had been filed). While the Court could attach a condition to any refiling of this act…
Authorities Cited
- Pontenberg v. Boston Sci. Corp., 252 F.3d 1253 (11th Cir. 2001)
- Waters v. UMA Educ., Inc., 2017 WL 6387780 (M.D. Fla. 2020)