VILLALBA
v.
SHARECARE, INC.
Defendant. /
ORDER1
Before the Court is Defendant’s Notice of Removal (Doc. 1).
Defendant removed from state court based on diversity jurisdiction. The Court must inquire into jurisdiction whenever it may be lacking. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Inc. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994).
Diversity jurisdiction requires completely diverse parties and an amount in controversy over $75,000. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a).
While the parties are diverse, the only hint at an amount in controversy is Plaintiff’s settlement offer for $92,900, not including any attorney’s fees or costs. (Docs. 1 at 2-3; 1-3).
Defendant is correct settlement offers may support removal. E.g., Alilin v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., No. 6:14-cv-1183-Orl-41DAB, 2014 WL 7734262, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 30, 2014).
Yet by their nature, settlement offers (even post-suit) reflect a fair amount of puffing and posturing. See Brooks v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., No. 6:18-cv-554-Orl- 37DCI, 2018 WL 3545421, at *2 (M.D. Fla. July 24, 2018).
So on their own, settlement
Because all that Defendant presents is Plaintiff's settlement offer, the amount in controversy—and thus jurisdiction—is_ unclear.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: Defendant must SUPPLEMENT its Notice of Removal (Doc. 1), on or before February 28, 2020, to show cause why this case should not be remanded for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Failure to comply with this Order will result in remand of the case without further notice. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 21st day of February, 2020.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies: All Parties of Record
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Villalba v. Sharecare, Inc., 2014 WL 7734262 (M.D. Fla. 2020)…s Plaintiff’s settlement offer for $92,900, not including any attorney’s fees or costs. (Docs. 1 at 2-3; 1-3). Defendant is correct settlement offers may support removal. E.g., Alilin v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., No. 6:14-cv-1183-Orl-41DAB, 2014 WL 7734262, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 30, 2014). Yet by their nature, settlement offers (even post-suit) reflect a fair amount of puffing and posturing. See Brooks v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., No. 6:18-cv-554-Orl- 37DCI, 2018 WL 3545421, at *2 (M.D. Fla. July 24, 2…1 / 2
-
Asuzene Grady v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc. (M.D. Fla. 2025)…lect Portfolio Serv., Inc., 651 F. Supp. 2d 1279, 1281 (S.D. Ala. 2009); see also -7- ---PAGE 7--- Case 3:25-cv-01130-MMH-PDB Document 23 Filed 11/14/25 Page 8 of 12 PageID 219 Alilin v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., No. 6:14-cv-1183-Orl-41DAB, 2014 WL 7734262, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 30, 2014). Indeed, “[s]ettlement offers that provide specific information to support the plaintiffs claim for damages suggest the plaintiff is offering a reasonable assessment of the value of his claim and are entitled to more…1 / 2
-
McCoy v. Lowe's Home Ctrs., LLC (M.D. Fla. 2025)…”). ---PAGE 4--- little weight in measuring the preponderance of the evidence.” Jackson v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., 651 F. Supp. 2d 1279, 1281 (S.D. Ala. 2009); see also Alilin v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., No. 6:14-cv-1183-Orl-41DAB, 2014 WL 7734262, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 30, 2014). Notably, “[s]ettlement offers that provide specific information to support the plaintiff's claim for damages suggest the plaintiff is offering a reasonable assessment of the value of his claim and are entitled to mo…1 / 3
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375 (U.S. 1994)
- Villalba v. Sharecare, Inc., 2014 WL 7734262 (M.D. Fla. 2020)